By Andrew Mackinnon
Last updated: 19th March, 2025
Equitable Allocation of Spending
Discussion
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The Australian federal government should operate a discussion forum on the internet as an Australian federal government service to Australian citizens.
Australian citizens have little say in the direction in which the Australian federal government takes Australia and have had little say for decades.
Australian citizens urgently need a formal, structured mechanism for making their views known to the Australian federal government about policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) that necessarily affect their interests as Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation.
In the interests of protecting and enhancing democracy in Australia, the Australian federal government should operate a discussion forum on the internet as an Australian federal government service to Australian citizens, which is exclusively concerned with policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) that necessarily affect their interests as Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation, so that Australian citizens can participate in such a discussion forum on the internet, in order to make their views on policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) known in good faith and discuss policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) with other Australian citizens, as a means of effectively and efficiently informing their elected Australian federal representatives in the Australian federal parliament and Australian federal government employees in Australian federal government services (collectively known as the Australian Public Service (APS), ideally named the “Australian Civil Service (ACS)”) of their views as Australian citizens regarding policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government).
Since such a discussion forum on the internet would be operated by the Australian federal government, Australian citizens would hopefully be motivated to participate in good faith and ensure that the views they make known and the discussions they conduct conform to high standards of integrity.
Obviously, it would be in the best interests of Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to make their views known and conduct discussions in the best possible manner, in order to convince other Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to adopt their views.
However, by enabling Australian citizens to discuss policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) with each other, such a discussion forum on the internet would provide Australian citizens with opportunities to learn from the views of other Australian citizens about policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) and adjust their own views when they realise that the views of other Australian citizens better serve the interests of Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation.
The name for this discussion forum on the internet could be “Australian Discussion”.
The website for this discussion forum on the internet could be “australian-discussion.gov.au”.
Abortion
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Criminalise abortion in Australia, with the limited exception of:
~ abortions of conceptions arising from sexual assault, including pedophilia and rape
~ abortions of conceptions arising from incest
Pornography
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Criminalise the production of pornography and the distribution of pornography in Australia in all forms, including paper-based, video, DVD and internet, since freedom of speech only legitimately applies to the spoken or written word, as a means of preventing Australian citizens from viewing pornography, on the basis that viewing pornography is harmful to Australian citizens and therefore harmful to the health of Australia as a nation.
In practice, the only way for the Australian federal government to effectively and efficiently criminalise the distribution of pornography in Australia in all forms, including paper-based, video, DVD and internet, since freedom of speech only legitimately applies to the spoken or written word, as a means of preventing Australian citizens from viewing pornography, on the basis that viewing pornography is harmful to Australian citizens and therefore harmful to the health of Australia as a nation, is for an Australian federal government entity to maintain a list of websites and web pages that Australian citizens are banned from viewing in Australia, on the grounds that these websites and web pages contain pornography, so that all internet service providers in Australia have clear guidance from the Australian federal government about which websites and web pages they need to prevent Australian citizens from accessing, when providing internet access to Australian citizens, in order to comply with the criminalisation of the distribution of pornography in Australia by the Australian federal government.
Since the Australian federal government should want to ban other websites and web pages on the internet, such as websites and web pages associated with various types of criminality, it is very important that the list of websites and web pages banned by the Australian federal government is segmented by appropriate categories, such as “Drug Use”, “Pornography” and “Violence”.
It is also very important that the list of websites and web pages banned by the Australian federal government is publicly available to Australian citizens, so that they can be confident that the Australian federal government is not banning websites and web pages that Australian citizens have legitimate rights to access.
For your consideration…
Migration
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
(i.e. “Australian Migration”, comprising…)
Relocation
(i.e. “Australian Relocation”)
Forcibly relocate Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan, since their ancestors lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ.
Jewish people are descendants of Esau and the Edomites.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakhstan
The current ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia is estimated to be as follows:
100% – Population of Australia – 27.2 million
3% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million
45% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 12.2 million
32% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australia citizens – 8.7 million
7% – Non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – 2.0 million
13% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.5 million
Forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current circa 27 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for goods, services and assets in Australia, including demand for groceries, residential properties for rent and residential properties, thereby causing prices of goods, services and assets in Australia to decrease, including prices of groceries, rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties, as well as freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) who are currently living in Australia.
Forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing salaries and wages of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia, resulting in more space per person in Australia.
Forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan will also result in fewer people living in Australia and sharing Australia’s resources (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera), so that there will be more resources per person in Australia, making everybody in Australia more prosperous.
Deportation
(i.e. “Australian Deportation”)
Deport non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering in the order of 2 million, back to their countries of origin.
Non-white non-citizens of Australia, numbering in the order of 2 million, include Jews (i.e. Edomities), Indians, Sri Lankans, Nepalese, Chinese, other Asians, Pacific Islanders, Arabs, Greeks and Italians.
The current ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia is estimated to be as follows:
100% – Population of Australia – 27.2 million
3% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million
45% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 12.2 million
32% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australia citizens – 8.7 million
7% – Non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – 2.0 million
13% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.5 million
Deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering in the order of 2 million, back to their countries of origin will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current circa 27 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for goods, services and assets in Australia, including demand for groceries, residential properties for rent and residential properties, thereby causing prices of goods, services and assets in Australia to decrease, including prices of groceries, rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties, as well as freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the circa 2 million non-white non-citizens of Australia who are currently living in Australia.
Deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering in the order of 2 million, back to their countries of origin will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing salaries and wages of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia, resulting in more space per person in Australia.
Deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering in the order of 2 million, back to their countries of origin will also result in fewer people living in Australia and sharing Australia’s resources (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera), so that there will be more resources per person in Australia, making everybody in Australia more prosperous.
Repatriation
(i.e. “Australian Repatriation”)
(repatriate: “to send a person back to the country of his or her birth or citizenship”)
Offer non-white Australian citizens, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens, numbering in the order of 8.7 million, amounts of money, such as $7,500 AUD for adults and $3,750 AUD for minors, to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin.
Non-white Australian citizens, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens, numbering in the order of 8.7 million, include Jews (i.e. Edomites), Indians, Sri Lankans, Nepalese, Chinese, other Asians, Pacific Islanders, Arabs, Greeks and Italians.
The current ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia is estimated to be as follows:
100% – Population of Australia – 27.2 million
3% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million
45% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 12.2 million
32% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australia citizens – 8.7 million
7% – Non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – 2.0 million
13% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.5 million
Repatriating non-white Australian citizens, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens, numbering in the order of 8.7 million, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current circa 27 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for goods, services and assets in Australia, including demand for groceries, residential properties for rent and residential properties, thereby causing prices of goods, services and assets in Australia to decrease, including prices of groceries, rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties, as well as freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the circa 8.7 million non-white Australian citizens who are currently living in Australia.
Repatriating non-white Australian citizens, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens, numbering in the order of 8.7 million, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing salaries and wages of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia, resulting in more space per person in Australia.
Repatriating non-white Australian citizens, obviously with the exception of indigenous, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens, numbering in the order of 8.7 million, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin will also result in fewer people living in Australia and sharing Australia’s resources (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera), so that there will be more resources per person in Australia, making everybody in Australia more prosperous.
Immigration
(i.e. “Australian Immigration”)
Ban immigration of non-white people into Australia.
Non-white people include Jews (i.e. Edomites), Indians, Sri Lankans, Nepalese, Chinese, other Asians, Pacific Islanders, Arabs, Greeks and Italians.
Non-white immigration into Australia causes:
~ higher prices of goods (e.g. groceries), services (e.g. residential properties for rent) and assets (e.g. residential properties) in Australia, being inflation, due to increased demand for goods, services and assets resulting from more people living in Australia
~ lower salaries and wages in Australia due to increased supply of labour resulting from more people living in Australia
~ higher unemployment in Australia due to increased supply of labour resulting from more people living in Australia
~ increased congestion on roads and public transport in Australia resulting from more people living in Australia
Therefore, the purpose of non-white immigration into Australia is to diminish the quality of life of white Australian citizens and replace them with non-white immigrants to Australia.
Ban immigration of white people who cannot read and write the native language of Australia, being English, into Australia, since it will not be readily possible for them to learn to speak the native language of Australia, being English, in Australia.
Only allow immigration of white people who can read and write the native language of Australia, being English, into Australia, since it will be readily possible for them to learn to speak the native language of Australia, being English, in Australia.
Limit immigration into Australia to predominantly white people originating from white countries around the world (not predominantly Jewish (i.e. predominantly Edomitish) people originating from white countries around the world), who can read and write the native language of Australia, being English, since it will therefore be readily possible for them to learn to speak the native language of Australia, being English, in Australia, including the following white countries around the world (whose estimated populations are shown):
Ireland – 5 million
Northern Ireland – 2 million
Scotland – 5 million
England – 56 million
Wales – 3 million
France – 67 million
Belgium – 11 million
Netherlands – 17 million
Germany – 83 million
Switzerland – 10 million
Liechtenstein – less than 1 million
Austria – 9 million
Czech Republic – 11 million
Poland – 38 million
Lithuania – 3 million
Latvia – 2 million
Estonia – 1 million
Finland – 6 million
Sweden – 10 million
Norway – 5 million
Denmark – 6 million
Iceland – less than 1 million
Ukraine – 41 million
Russia – 146 million
United States of America – 331 million
Canada – 38 million
Australia – 27 million
New Zealand – 5 million
In any given financial year, from 1st July to the following 30th June, one year later, immigration into Australia over the course of that financial year should not exceed 0.10% of the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of that financial year.
For example, if the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of any given financial year is 25 million, then immigration into Australia over the course of that financial year should not exceed 0.10% of 25 million, being 25,000 people.
Australia – Population and Demographic Data – 1900 to 2022
Very soon after I finished Year 12 in secondary school in late 1990, I was sitting in traffic on a Friday afternoon in Sydney, New South Wales, which was banked up a long way. It was an eye-opening welcome for me as a secondary school leaver to adult life in Australia.
The last time traffic in Sydney, New South Wales was free of congestion was in about 1979, when the size of the population of Australia was about 14 million, so I would obviously like to see the size of the population of Australia decrease from the current circa 27 million to as close to about 14 million as possible, as a result of forcible relocation of Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan, deportation of non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds) back to their countries of origin and repatriation of non-white Australian citizens, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin.
Punishment and Correction
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
(i.e. “Australian Punishment and Correction”, comprising…)
Executions
(i.e. “Australian Executions”)
Reintroduce capital punishment in Australia, involving death by hanging for convicted perpetrators of capital crimes in Australia, being treason (e.g. knowingly perpetrating election fraud, knowingly perpetrating the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, sexual assault (e.g. pedophilia, rape), aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson.
There is no reason why the perpetration of these capital crimes in Australia should result in an obligation by taxpayers in Australia to fund the imprisonment of the perpetrators, which involves supplying them with water, food, clothing and shelter for several years while they are imprisoned.
Capital punishment involving death by hanging for convicted perpetrators of capital crimes in Australia provides an ominous warning to Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia that if they commit a capital crime in Australia and are convicted in court, they will be executed, irrespective of their ethnicity, whether white, Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, Arab, Indian, Chinese, other Asian, Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) or any other ethnicity.
Convicted perpetrators of capital crimes in Australia should be executed by hanging in public, so that interested Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia can gather and watch.
These hangings in public should be video-recorded and the resulting videos should be published on the internet, so that interested Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia who are not able to gather and watch these hangings in public can watch these hangings on the internet.
Obviously these hangings in public and their video-recordings published on the internet would provide a strong deterrent to Australian citizens in Australia and non-citizens of Australia in Australia against committing capital crimes in Australia, being treason (e.g. knowingly perpetrating election fraud, knowingly perpetrating the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, sexual assault (e.g. pedophilia, rape), aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson.
Prisons
(i.e. “Australian Prisons”)
Convicted perpetrators of threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as common assault, should be incarcerated in prisons in Australia, whose purpose should be to rehabilitate convicted perpetrators of threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as common assault, so that they become worthwhile Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia upon their release from prisons in Australia.
Orders
(i.e. “Australian Orders”)
Convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia should be subject to community-based orders in Australia, in order to rehabilitate convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, so that they become worthwhile Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia upon the conclusion of the community-based orders to which they are subject.
Convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, who are subject to community-based orders, should be made to wear highly visible security rings around their necks, whose colours indicate the types of non-threatening non-capital crimes committed by their wearers, such as red for theft, for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject, which would obviously provide a powerful and effective deterrent against Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia committing non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, on account of the social stigma of wearing highly visible security rings around their necks which identify them as convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia and indicate by their colours which types of non-threatening non-capital crimes, such as theft, they have committed.
The objective is obviously to dramatically reduce the incidence of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft.
It is alarming that business owners in Australia, such as retailers, and residential property owners in Australia, such as owner-occupiers, are spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars every year in Australia, in order to secure their property against the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia, when the Australian federal government could spend a fraction of that amount to dramatically reduce the incidence of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia by requiring that convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, wear highly visible security rings around their necks for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject.
Instead of retailers in Australia spending an enormous amount of money every year to lock valuable merchandise up in their stores and thereby protect their stores against the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia, the Australian federal government could spend a fraction of that amount to dramatically reduce the incidence of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia by locking highly visible security rings around the necks of convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject.
This idea of requiring that convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia wear highly visible security rings for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject would enable prisons in Australia to only be used to incarcerate convicted perpetrators of threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as common assault.
Community-based orders should require that convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia make restitution, including financial payments, to the victims of their non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia.
For example, convicted perpetrators of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia should be required by the community-based orders to which they are subject to return the stolen goods or stolen money to their owners or pay the equivalent value to their owners, as well as pay whatever amounts to their owners that the judiciary in Australia decides upon as restitution.
Once convicted perpetrators of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia have met the requirements of the community-based orders to which they are subject, the highly visible security rings around their necks, coloured red to indicate the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft, would be removed.
Mandatory Sentencing
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Deliberately defacing or damaging public property or private property in Australia, such as via graffiti, is a very serious crime which should carry a mandatory sentence of a community-based order of three years duration involving an appropriate intensity of labour.
A community-based order of two years duration does not provide a sufficient deterrent to potential perpetrators of the crime of deliberately defacing or damaging public property or private property in Australia and is not enough time to re-educate a person who has decided that he or she is entitled to deliberately deface or damage public property or private property in Australia.
Therefore, a mandatory sentence of a community-based order of three years duration involving an appropriate intensity of labour for deliberately defacing or damaging public property or private property in Australia is required.
Banking
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Australia needs a publicly owned, federal “Australian Bank” that lends to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, for mortgages, personal loans, business loans of all types and sizes and loans of all types and sizes to not-for-profit entities, without charging any interest on this lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
However, various rates of around 1% or less would need to be charged by the Australian Bank on all lending by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, in order to cover the various incidences of default on loans to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
This Australian Bank should operate on a not-for-profit basis and cover its operating costs by charging account-keeping fees and transaction fees, paid by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, who and which use the Australian Bank, which account-keeping fees and transaction fees should be limited to covering the actual costs incurred by the Australian Bank to administer the accounts of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities and to process the transactions of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
Money is created when the Australian Bank lends to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, so that the money supply in Australia increases.
Money is destroyed when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay principal on loans they owe to the Australian Bank, so that the money supply in Australia decreases.
Therefore, when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities borrow more money per unit time from the Australian Bank than Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay per unit time to the Australian Bank, such as when the total amounts of money lent by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities increase as multiples of their respective incomes, profits and operating surpluses, the money supply in Australia increases.
Therefore, when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities borrow less money per unit time from the Australian Bank than Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay per unit time to the Australian Bank, such as when the total amounts of money lent by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities decrease as multiples of their respective incomes, profits and operating surpluses, the money supply in Australia decreases.
The size of the money supply in Australia can be increased and decreased to control inflation by increasing and decreasing the total amounts of principal that the Australian Bank is allowed to lend to Australian citizens, Australian businesses (such as sole traders, partnerships and companies) and Australian not-for-profit entities (such as churches and charities), expressed as higher and lower multiples of the incomes of Australian citizens, profits of Australian businesses and operating surpluses of Australian not-for-profit entities.
These multiples should be different for different types of borrowers, such as Australian citizens, Australian businesses (including sole traders, partnerships and companies) and Australian not-for-profit entities (including churches and charities).
For example, the Australian Bank could be limited to lending 4.0 times the income of any given Australian citizen, so that the total borrowing of that Australian citizen, such as including a mortgage and a personal loan, is not allowed to exceed 4.0 times the income of that Australian citizen.
For any given married couple of Australian citizens, the Australian Bank could be limited to lending 4.0 times their combined income, so that the total borrowing of that married couple of Australian citizens, such as including a mortgage and personal loans, is not allowed to exceed 4.0 times the combined income of that married couple of Australian citizens.
The analog of interest-only loans, being loans with no repayments whatsoever until repayment of the entire principal of the loan, would not be allowed by the Australian Bank under any circumstances.
The size of the money supply in Australia can also be increased as necessary by way of the Australian Bank creating money out of nothing as necessary in the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank for the Australian Treasury to spend into circulation as necessary on behalf of the Australian federal government.
(The manner in which the Australian Bank creates money out of nothing as necessary in the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank is by debiting its asset account of “Australian Currency” for the amount of money created and crediting its liability account of the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank for the amount of money created.)
The size of the money supply in Australia can also be decreased as necessary by way of the Australian Bank destroying money collected by the Australian Treasury via Goods and Services Tax (GST) paid by Australian citizens into the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank.
(The manner in which the Australian Bank destroys money collected by the Australian Treasury via Goods and Services Tax paid by Australian citizens into the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank is by debiting its liability account of the account of the Australian Treasury with the Australian Bank for the amount of money to be destroyed and crediting its asset account of “Australian Currency” for the amount of money to be destroyed.)
However, it is best for the Australian federal government to avoid directing the Australian Bank to create money and bringing it into circulation, in order to increase the size of the money supply by spending the money on one or more Australian federal government projects, because the primary way for the Australian Bank to subsequently destroy this money, in order to subsequently decrease the size of the money supply, is to destroy money in the form of tax collected by the Australian federal government from taxpayers in Australia, namely Goods and Services Tax.
(Nevertheless, it is also possible for the Australian Bank to destroy money in the form of tolls (or other forms of payment) collected by the Australian federal government from Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, which they have paid during the course of using roads (or receiving other goods (e.g. steel) or services (e.g. electricity)) that the Australian federal government has financed and built (or produced or provided), by directing the Australian Bank to create money and bringing it into circulation.
This a powerful form of economic management which must be exercised in a disciplined manner.)
Since the lowest possible taxation in Australia is the most desirable, in the form of the Goods and Services Tax, there should be little opportunity for the Australian federal government to destroy tax collected in order to decrease the size of the money supply as necessary.
Goods and Services Tax collected by the Australian federal government is needed to fund the operation of the Australian federal government, to fund the services that the Australian federal government delivers to Australian citizens and to fund the projects that the Australian federal government embarks upon and completes, such as infrastructure projects.
If the Australian federal government has a shortfall in revenue from Goods and Services Tax, it should only direct the Australian Bank with caution to sparingly create money by debiting its asset account called “Currency” with newly-created-out-of-nothing money and crediting its liability account of the account of the Australian federal government for the same amount, so that the Australian federal government can spend that money into circulation, such as by paying the salaries and wages of Australian federal government employees, since the primary way for the Australian federal government to destroy money in circulation that has been created by the Australian Bank in this manner, as opposed to money that has been created by the Australian Bank lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, is for the Australian Bank to destroy Goods and Services Tax that has been collected by the Australian federal government by debiting its liability account of the account of the Australian federal government for the amount of Goods and Services Tax to be destroyed and crediting its asset account called “Currency” for the same amount.
Therefore, if the Australian federal government has a shortfall in revenue from the Goods and Services Tax, it is obviously best if the Australian federal government anticipates collecting sufficient Goods and Services Tax in the future, before directing the Australian Bank to create money by debiting its asset account called “Currency” with the newly-created-out-of-nothing money and crediting its liability account of the account of the Australian federal government for the same amount, so that the Australian Bank can destroy that money in the future by destroying Goods and Services Tax collected by the Australian federal government in the future.
Taxation
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The only Australian federal government tax should be the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
The Goods and Services Tax should be charged by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of 25% on all goods and services sold in Australia, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods, in order to facilitate efficient administration of the Goods and Services Tax by Australian citizens, Australian businesses, Australian not-for-profit entities and Australian federal government entities.
The Goods and Services Tax should not be charged on second-hand goods under any circumstances.
There should be no other exceptions to the Goods and Services Tax under any circumstances, including food and rent, in order to facilitate efficient administration of the Goods and Services Tax by Australian citizens, Australian businesses, Australian not-for-profit entities and Australian federal government entities.
Consider an Australian citizen who has a lawn mowing business in Australia and earns $50 (excluding GST) mowing a customer’s lawn, while incurring $8 (excluding GST) in expenses, including gasoline, in order to mow that lawn.
They would charge the customer $50 plus $12.50 in Goods and Services Tax at a rate of 25%, totalling $62.50.
They would pay $8 plus $2 in Goods and Services Tax at a rate of 25% for their expenses, totalling $10.
They would owe the Australian Government $10.50 (i.e. $12.50 – $2) in Goods and Services Tax and earn $42 (i.e. $62.50 – $10 – $10.50 or $50 – $8) in net income after tax.
The Goods and Services Tax ensures that the Australian federal government treats all Australian citizens equally, by charging each of them the same flat rate of Goods and Services Tax on the goods and services they buy.
A flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% charged by the Australian federal government on all goods and services sold in Australia, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods, would make all Australian citizens who pay Goods and Services Tax contributors to the operation of Australia and therefore legitimate stakeholders in the Australian federal government.
The Australian federal government would be able to raise circa $275 billion in taxation revenue per year from a Goods and Services Tax at a flat rate of 25% on all goods and services, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods.
(For reasons I do not understand, $275 billion in taxation revenue per year is presumably the same amount that would be raised by the Australian federal government if it charged a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over.)
(Any additional money that the Australian federal government pays to recipients of welfare payments in Australia, including Elderly Payments, in order to cover a flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25%, will be received back by the Australian federal government as Goods and Services Tax in amounts that are more or less the same via purchases that these recipients of welfare payments make, on which they necessarily pay Goods and Services Tax at the flat rate of 25%.
Therefore, a flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% will not result in the Australian federal government needing to effectively increase the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare payments.)
Abolish income tax, since income tax is inequitable and therefore intolerable.
For example, even with a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold, somebody earning $120,000 per year pays $30,000 per year in income tax, whereas somebody earning $60,000 per year pays $15,000 per year in income tax.
However, both of these hypothetical somebodies receive the same level of Australian federal government services, despite that the higher-earning somebody pays twice as much income tax as the lower-earning somebody.
This constitutes a large transfer of wealth from the higher-earning somebody to the lower-earning somebody, which is inequitable and therefore intolerable.
Abolish capital gains tax (CGT), since it is a highly offensive violation of property rights of Australian citizens and Australian entities over assets exhibiting capital gains.
Capital gains tax in Australia constitutes less than 10% of all tax revenue collected in Australia by the Australian federal government.
In fact, the percentage of total tax revenue collected by the Australian federal government that is attributable to capital gains tax is so small that I have not been able to find out what this percentage actually is on any Australian federal government website. The Australian federal government has deliberately concealed this information from Australian citizens and Australian entities.
The Australian federal government does not levy capital gains tax on Australian citizens and Australian entities because it needs tax revenue from capital gains tax. The Australian federal government levies capital gains tax on Australian citizens and Australian entities only because it does not want them to have the full capital gains to which they are legitimately entitled. Capital gains should not be taxed under any circumstances.
Capital gains tax is in direct opposition to property rights and should be abolished. With capital gains tax in force, if an Australian citizen saves up some money and then invests it in shares (or any asset), they quite obviously do not have full property rights to the asset they purchased, because if they later sell this asset for more than they paid for it, the Australian federal government wants a cut of the capital gain via capital gains tax. If they have full property rights to the asset they purchased, they could sell this asset and keep the full amount they receive for it without paying any capital gains tax.
An Australian citizen who trades shares in order to make capital gains and who then withdraws a portion of their accumulated capital, in order to fund their living expenses, does not earn any income and should not be taxed on the capital gains they make. Instead, they are consuming a portion of the capital they have accumulated, in order to fund their living expenses.
However, income tax should be abolished, so that there should no longer be any need to tax income anyway.
Abolish fuel tax, which the Australian federal government claims is used to construct and maintain roads in Australia, since all Australian citizens benefit from roads in Australia and the transport of goods they make possible, including those who do not drive motor vehicles, so that the construction and maintenance of roads in Australia should be paid for by the Australian federal government out of the Goods and Services Tax.
Abolish all business taxes on business profits generated by businesses in Australia, since business profits should only be taxed after they are paid to the owners of the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax, including dividends paid out of company profits generated by companies in Australia to the shareholders of the companies in Australia who own them.
However, income tax should be abolished, so that there should no longer be any need to tax business profits generated by businesses in Australia after they are paid to the owners of the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax.
There should be no taxes on the profits of businesses in Australia (i.e. sole traders, partnerships, companies, corporations, et cetera), which are distributed to Australian citizens and citizens of other countries who own the businesses in Australia (i.e. proprietors, partners, shareholders, et cetera) as income of those Australian citizens and citizens of other countries, which could then be subject to income tax in Australia and those other countries. This means that the profits of businesses in Australia, which are distributed to the Australian citizens and citizens of other countries who own the businesses in Australia which generated them, should only be taxed once as income of the Australian citizens and citizens of other countries who own the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax.
However, income tax should be abolished, so that there should no longer be any need to tax business profits generated by businesses in Australia after they are paid to the owners of the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax.
Abolish all other Australian federal government taxes, including the Medicare Levy, with the exception of the Goods and Services Tax (GST).
Government
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
For further explanation…
Following is a condensed list of proposed Australian federal government services, together with their estimated annual budgets from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) in billions (b) of dollars (i.e. thousands of millions of dollars) and their proposed sources of funding:
(Excluding “Australian Infrastructure”, the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via the Goods and Services Tax, of these proposed Australian federal government services is $246.680 billion.
Including “Australian Infrastructure”, which has an estimated annual budget of up to $30.000 billion (i.e. a maximum of $30.000 billion), the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via the Goods and Services Tax, of these proposed Australian federal government services is up to $276.680 billion (i.e. a maximum of $276.680 billion).)
> $0.200 b – Australian Discussion – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.500 b – Australian Audit – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Department of Domestic Affairs – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.200 b – Australian Reporting – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Elections – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.150 b – Australian Federal Elections – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.150 b – Australian Federal Referendums – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.100 b – Australian Local Elections – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.050 b – Australian Parliament – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.050 b – Australian Parliament Services – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.020 b – Australian Parliament Analysis – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.750 b – Australian Forum of Representatives – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Forum of Representatives Services – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.150 b – Australian Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet – Goods and Services Tax – Including:
~ $0.150 b – Australian Department of National Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.400 b – Australian Department of the Attorney-General – Goods and Services Tax – Including:
~ $0.300 b – Australian Department of Domestic Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
> $10.000 b – Australian Police Force – Goods and Services Tax
> $1.000 b – Australian Judiciary – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.150 b – Australian Punishment and Correction – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.010 b – Australian Executions – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.500 b – Australian Prisons – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.000 b – Australian Orders – Perpetrator pays – Fines
> $1.000 b – Australian Border Force – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.750 b – Australian Detention – Goods and Services Tax
> $10.000 b – Australian Defence Force – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Bank – Not-for-profit – User pays – Account-keeping fees and transaction fees
> $0.050 b – Australian Treasury – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $2.000 b – Australian Taxation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Statistics – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Analysis – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Productivity – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Management – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.150 b – Australian Regulation – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.025 b – Australian Auditing Standards – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Accounting Standards – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.400 b – Australian Enterprise – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.750 b – Australian Equity – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Insurance – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Securities Exchange – Not-for-profit – User pays
> $0.500 b – Australian Emergency – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.200 b – Australian Environment – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Wildlife – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Parks – Not-for-profit – User pays – Entry cost
> $2.000 b – Australian Roads – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Water – Not-for-profit – User pays – Water bill
> $0.075 b – Australian Agriculture – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.025 b – Australian Fisheries – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.050 b – Australian Forestry – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Mining – Not-for-profit – User pays – Transfer prices of extracted resources, including coal, natural gas, iron ore, bauxite and copper sulfide, sold on a not-for-profit basis to other publicly owned Australian federal government entities, including coal to Australian Coal, for the distribution and sale of coal, natural gas to Australian Natural Gas, for the production, distribution and sale of processed natural gas, coal and iron ore to Australian Steel, for the production, distribution and sale of steel, bauxite to Australian Aluminium, for the production, distribution and sale of aluminium, copper sulfide to Australian Copper, for the production, distribution and sale of copper, et cetera
> $0.250 b – Australian Resources – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.000 b – Australian Coal – Not-for-profit – User pays – Coal prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Natural Gas – Not-for-profit – User pays – Natural gas prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Steel – Not-for-profit – User pays – Steel prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aluminium – Not-for-profit – User pays – Aluminium prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Copper – Not-for-profit – User pays – Copper prices
~ $0.000 b – Et cetera – Not-for-profit – User pays – Et cetera prices
> $0.000 b – Australian Electricity – Not-for-profit – User pays – Electricity bill
> $0.050 b – Australian Industry – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.100 b – Australian Manufacturing – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.050 b – Australian Communications – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.150 b – Australian Communications Authority – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.000 b – Australian Telecommunications – Not-for-profit – User pays – Telecommunications bill
~ $0.300 b – Australian Broadcasting – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Postage – Not-for-profit – User pays – Postage cost
> $0.000 b – Australian Buses – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket cost
> $0.000 b – Australian Railways – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket cost and cargo cost (?)
> $0.000 b – Australian Ports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Unknown (?)
> $0.000 b – Australian Airports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Unknown (?)
> $0.200 b – Australian Aviation – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.200 b – Australian Aviation Authority – Not-for-profit – Goods and Services Tax (GST)
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Control – Not-for-profit – User pays
> $0.400 b – Australian Services – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.000 b – Australian Registry – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.400 b – Australian Identity – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Motor – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays
~ $0.100 b – Australian Maritime – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Maritime Licencing – Not for profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Maritime Registration – Not for profit – User pays
~ $0.100 b – Australian Titles – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Land Titles – Not for-profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Residential Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays
– $0.000 b – Australian Commercial Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays
> $0.750 b – Australian Education – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $11.500 b – Australian Primary Schools – Goods and Services Tax
~ $11.500 b – Australian Secondary Schools – Goods and Services Tax
~ $2.500 b – Australian TAFE – Not-for-profit – Half Goods and Services Tax, half user pays
~ $2.500 b – Australian Universities – Not-for-profit – Half Goods and Services Tax, half user pays
> $20.000 b – Australian Health – Not-for-profit – Goods and Services Tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
> $0.500 b – Australian Welfare (currently “Centrelink”) – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.250 b – Australian Veterans – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.250 b – Australian Veteran Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $7.000 b – Australian Veteran Payments – Goods and Services Tax – NOT means-tested in relation to accumulated assets or income under any circumstances
~ $0.500 b – Australian Elderly – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Elderly Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $63.000 b – Australian Elderly Payments (currently “Age Pension”) – Goods and Services Tax – NOT means-tested in relation to accumulated assets or income under any circumstances
– $13.500 b – Australian Elderly Care (currently “Aged Care”) – Not-for-profit – Goods and Services Tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Disability – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Disability Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $17.000 b – Australian Disability Payments (currently “Disability Support Pension”) – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested in relation to income, NOT accumulated assets under any circumstances, to minimise cost incurred
– $12.500 b – Australian Disability Scheme (currently “National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS)”) – Not-for-profit – Goods and Services Tax – User pays – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.250 b – Australian Carers – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.250 b – Australian Carer Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $10.000 b – Australian Carer Payments – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Children – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Child Protection – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.500 b – Australian Child Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $10.000 b – Australian Child Carer Payments – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Unemployment – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Unemployment Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $14.000 b – Australian Unemployment Payments (currently “JobSeeker Payment”) – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested in relation to income, NOT accumulated assets under any circumstances, to minimise cost incurred
> Up to $30.000 b – Australian Infrastructure – Goods and Services Tax
Necessary infrastructure which cannot be funded via $30.000 billion of Goods and Services Tax each year will need to be funded via borrowing from the publicly owned Australian Bank, which will need to be repaid via fees charged by the Australian federal government to Australian citizens to use this infrastructure on a user-pays basis.
> $0.800 b – Australian Department of Foreign Affairs – Goods and Services Tax – Including:
~ $0.300 b – Australian Department of Foreign Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.400 b – Australian Trade – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Tourism – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.150 b – Australian Migration – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $1.000 b – Australian Relocation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Deportation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $4.000 b – Australian Repatriation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Immigration – Half user pays, half Goods and Services Tax
Following is a condensed list of proposed Australian local government services, together with their proposed sources of funding:
> Australian Local Government – Discussion – Australian local government rates
> Australian Local Government – Council – Australian local government rates
> Australian Local Government – Australian local government rates
> Australian Local Government – Environment – Australian local government rates
> Australian Local Government – Planning – Partly Australian local government rates, partly Austrailan local government fees
> Australian Local Government – Roads – Australian local government rates
> Australian Local Government – Paths – Australian local government rates
(i.e. footpaths, cycleways)
> Australian Local Government – Parks – Australian local government rates
(i.e. parks, cemeteries)
> Australian Local Government – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly Australian local government rates, partly Australian local government fees
(i.e. rubbish & recycling collection)
> Australian Local Government – Facilities – Partly Australian local government rates, partly Australian local government fees
(i.e. community centres, pools, et cetera)
For example:
> Brisbane City Government – Discussion – Brisbane City Government rates
> Brisbane City Government – Council – Brisbane City Government rates
> Brisbane City Government – Brisbane City Government rates
> Brisbane City Government – Environment – Brisbane City Government rates
> Brisbane City Government – Planning – Partly Brisbane City Government rates, partly Brisbane City Government fees
> Brisbane City Government – Roads – Brisbane City Government rates
> Brisbane City Government – Paths – Brisbane City Government rates
(i.e. footpaths, cycleways)
> Brisbane City Government – Parks – Brisbane City Government rates
(i.e. parks, cemeteries)
> Brisbane City Government – Rubbish & Recycling – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly Brisbane City Government rates, partly Brisbane City Government fees
(i.e. rubbish & recycling collection)
> Brisbane City Government – Facilities – Partly Brisbane City Government rates, partly Brisbane City Government fees
(i.e. community centres, pools, et cetera)
Australian local government rates for individual properties in Australian local government areas should not be calculated on the basis of property values in Australian local government areas, since property values in Australian local government areas have nothing whatsoever to do with the level of Australian local government services provided to the Australian citizens who use the individual properties.
Australian local government rates for individual properties in Australian local government areas should be calculated on the basis of the level of Australian local government services provided to individual properties, such as according to the number of Australian citizens who use the individual properties and their ages, in order to be able to accurately allocate the expenses of Australian local governments to individual properties via Australian local government rates.
Ministers
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
List of thirty-five (35) proposed Australian ministers in the Australian federal government…
~ Australian Minister for Discussion
(i.e. Australian Discussion)
~ Australian Auditor-General
(i.e. Australian Audit)
~ Australian Minister for Domestic Affairs
(i.e. Australian Department of Domestic Affairs)
~ Australian Prime Minister
(i.e. Australian Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet)
~ Australian Attorney-General
(i.e. Australian Department of the Attorney-General)
~ Australian Minister for Police
(i.e. Australian Police Force)
~ Australian Minister for Punishment and Correction
(i.e. Australian Punishment and Correction, comprising Australian Executions, Australian Prisons and Australian Orders)
~ Australian Minister for Borders
(i.e. Australian Border Force)
~ Australian Minister for Detention
(i.e. Australian Detention)
~ Australian Minister for Defence
(i.e. Australian Defence Force)
~ Australian Minister for Banking
(i.e. Australian Bank)
~ Australian Treasurer
(i.e. Australian Treasury)
~ Australian Minister for Regulation
(i.e. Australian Regulation)
~ Australian Minister for Securities
(i.e. Australian Securities Exchange)
~ Australian Minister for Emergency
(i.e. Australian Emergency)
~ Australian Minister for Environment, Wildlife and Parks
(i.e. Australian Environment, Australian Wildlife and Australian Parks)
~ Australian Minister for Roads
(i.e. Australian Roads)
~ Australian Minister for Water
(i.e. Australian Water)
~ Australian Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
(i.e. Australian Agriculture, Australian Fisheries and Australian Forestry)
~ Australian Minister for Mining
(i.e. Australian Mining)
~ Australian Minister for Resources
(i.e. Australian Resources, comprising Australian Coal, Australian Natural Gas, Australian Steel, Australian Aluminium, Australian Copper, et cetera)
~ Australian Minister for Electricity
(i.e. Australian Electricity)
~ Australian Minister for Communications
(i.e. Australian Communications)
~ Australian Minister for Postage
(i.e. Australian Post)
~ Australian Minister for Buses, Railways and Ports
(i.e. Australian Buses, Australian Railways and Australian Ports)
~ Australian Minister for Airports and Aviation
(i.e. Australian Airports and Australian Aviation)
~ Australian Minister for Services
(i.e. Australian Services)
~ Australian Minister for Education
(i.e. Australian Education)
~ Australian Minister for Health
(i.e. Australian Health)
~ Australian Minister for Industry
(i.e. Australian Industry)
~ Australian Minister for Welfare
(i.e. Australian Welfare)
~ Australian Minister for Infrastructure
(i.e. Australian Infrastructure)
~ Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs
(i.e. Australian Department of Foreign Affairs)
~ Australian Minister for Trade and Tourism
(i.e. Australian Trade and Tourism)
~ Australian Minister for Migration
(i.e. Australian Migration)
Equitable Allocation of Spending
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The most equitable means of allocating Australian federal government spending in its characteristically large amounts in relation to Australian federal government services, such as education, health and infrastructure, between different Australian federal electorates is on the basis of the different numbers of Australian citizens living in different Australian federal electorates, weighted according to the ages of these Australian citizens (on the basis of the extents to which different ages of Australian citizens utilise these Australian federal government services) and possibly weighted according to the different geographical characteristics of different Australian federal electorates, such as density of population, which influence the structure of Australian federal government services to be provided, such as the number of locations at which these Australian federal government services should be provided, thereby affecting the cost of these Australian federal government services to be provided.
Human judgement is NOT an equitable means of allocating Australian federal government spending in its characteristically large amounts in relation to Australian federal government services, such as education, health and infrastructure, between different Australian federal electorates.
It is becoming more apparent that there has not been an equitable allocation of Australian federal government spending in its characteristically large amounts in relation to Australian federal government services, such as education, health and infrastructure, between different Australian federal electorates for decades, with disastrous consequences for Australian citizens across the entirety of Australia.
Housing
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Ban non-white immigration into Australia.
Non-white immigration into Australia causes the number of people living in Australia to increase, thereby causing demand for residential properties in Australia in all forms, including houses, apartments and land, to increase and thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
Australia – Population and Demographic Data – 1900 to 2022
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Vital_statistics (Natural change equals births minus deaths.)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_India#Vital_statistics (Natural change equals births minus deaths.)
Non-white immigrants to Australia generally do not buy residential properties in Australia as soon as they arrive in Australia. It generally takes time for them to get their finances in order and save up a deposit in order to buy residential properties in Australia. There is generally a lag, often of years, between non-white immigrants to Australia arriving in Australia and demand for the purchase of residential properties in Australia in all forms, including houses, apartments and land, increasing as a result of their arrival in Australia.
This is why house prices in Australia continued to increase during the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19, despite that non-white immigration into Australia was greatly reduced during this time. Non-white immigrants to Australia who had arrived in Australia in previous years had already spent years getting their finances in order and saving up a deposit in order to buy residential properties in Australia, so that by the time the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19 transpired, they were ready to buy residential properties in Australia and did so.
Non-white immigration into Australia also provides a strong stream of tenants to create demand for residential rental properties in Australia, so that residential property investors can confidently earn rental income from their residential rental properties that they own as residential investment properties in Australia. Non-white immigration into Australia leads to an increase in demand for residential rental properties in Australia and an increase in rents. In the 1990s and 2000s, passive income in the form of rents from residential investment properties in Australia, being income earned without working for it, was marketed by the residential property industry in Australia as the holy grail of income. Australia’s economy has been built around this concept of passive income ever since.
Banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds) back to their countries of origin) and repatriating non-white Australian citizens, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 30%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.
Ban non-citizens of Australia from purchasing and owning residential properties in Australia.
Allowing non-citizens of Australia to purchase and own residential properties in Australia causes demand for residential properties in Australia to increase, thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
That the Australian federal government has not banned the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia shows that the Australian federal government does not govern exclusively for Australian citizens but for non-citizens of Australia also, of whom there are purportedly more than 8 billion (i.e. 8,000 million). Allowing non-citizens of Australia to purchase and own residential properties in Australia causes the number of people who want to purchase and own residential properties in Australia to increase, thereby causing demand for housing in Australia to increase and thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
Banning the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.
Restrain lending by the banks in Australia to owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and investors in residential properties in Australia.
Unrestrained bank lending to owner occupiers of residential properties in Australia and investors in residential properties in Australia causes the size of the money supply in Australia to increase, since banks in Australia create money when they lend and charge interest on it, thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
It is not the number of residential properties in Australia that owner occupiers and investors can buy that should be limited or rationed but necessarily the amount of credit that is extended by the banks in Australia (i.e. loaned) to owner occupiers and investors that should be limited or rationed, in order to prevent a housing bubble in Australia from materialising, which has, of course, existed in Australia for years now and is being deliberately perpetuated by the Australian federal government via non-white immigration into Australia.
The banks in Australia should not be lending more than an adjustable multiple of the incomes of owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and an adjustable multiple of the incomes of investors in residential properties in Australia, to owner-occupiers and investors for all borrowing purposes, including the purpose of buying residential properties in Australia as owner-occupiers and investors.
The banks in Australia should never have been allowed by the Australian federal government (which licenses the banks in Australia to operate) to provide interest-only loans to owner occupiers and investors in Australia.
The banks in Australia should be banned by the Australian federal government from providing interest-only loans in Australia for all borrowing purposes, including the purpose of buying residential properties in Australia.
In the order of 2 million Australian citizens (and presumably non-citizens of Australia) own one or more investment properties in Australia and are therefore investors in residential properties in Australia.
In round terms, one-third of the population of Australia of circa 27 million rents, being circa 9 million people.
Many of these 2 million Australian citizens (and presumably non-citizens of Australia) are seeking to increase the number of residential properties they own in Australia as investments. Since they are overwhelmingly funded by lending from the banks in Australia, rather than their own accumulated wealth, the willingness of the banks in Australia to lend much more to investors in residential properties in Australia as multiples of their incomes than is prudent (in order to increase their interest revenues, since the banks in Australia are motivated by profit, which is marketed to Australian citizens by the Australian federal government as being a sign of a “strong banking system in Australia”) is presumably resulting in multiple investors in residential properties in Australia competing with each other to buy many residential properties in Australia listed for sale, thereby bidding up the sale prices of many residential properties in Australia and thereby contributing significantly to the existing housing bubble in Australia.
Restraining lending by the banks in Australia to owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and investors in residential properties in Australia by limiting it to an adjustable multiple of the incomes of owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and an adjustable multiple of the incomes of investors in residential properties in Australia for all borrowing purposes, including the purpose of buying residential properties in Australia as owner-occupiers and investors, would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.
Emergency
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Fire
Ban controlled burning in Australia as a purported means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia.
Given the unpleasantness of breathing in particulate smoke from controlled burning, the likelihood of wild animals being burned to death as a result of controlled burning and the asininity of lighting fires in order to prevent fires from occurring, controlled burning does not constitute a desirable means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring.
Given that most wildfires (i.e. bushfires) in Australia are caused by arson, categorising arson as a capital crime and mandating capital punishment in the form of death by hanging for convicted perpetrators of arson is a desirable means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia by deterring others in Australia (e.g. Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia) from committing arson.
Most wildfires (i.e. bushfires) in Australia are deliberately lit by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia committing arson, in order to diminish the quality of life of as many white Australian citizens as possible.
It is likely that controlled burning in Australia as a purported means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia is actually a similar practice advocated by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia, so that the rationale of using controlled burning in Australia as a purported means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia is a spurious reason for controlled burning that is supplied by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia, in order to provide them with plausible deniability of the real reason for controlled burning in Australia, which is to diminish the quality of life of as many white Australian citizens as possible.
Environment
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Ban the mining method of hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) in Australia, on account of the mining method of hydraulic fracturing being overtly environmentally damaging to Australia.
Ban the mining method of extracting oil from the bottoms of bodies of water surrounding Australia or in Australia, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, on account of:
~ God never intending mankind to extract oil from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
~ the environmental damage that the mining method of extracting oil from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, causes to bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
~ the history of environmental disasters involving the mining method of extracting oil from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
Ban the mining method of extracting natural gas from the bottoms of bodies of water surrounding Australia or in Australia, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, on account of:
~ God never intending mankind to extract natural gas from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
~ the environmental damage that the mining method of extracting natural gas from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, causes to bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
Wildlife
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Ban the killing of feral horses in Australia, on account of the magnificence of feral horses in Australia.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the damage that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia inflict upon wildlife, namely birds, by injuring and killing them.
Agriculture
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Genetically-modified food
Ban the growing of genetically modified food in Australia, on account of genetically modified food being deliberately designed to be nutritionally deficient.
Live export
Ban live export immediately in Australia, being the commercial transport of livestock, such as sheep, across national borders.
It is not necessary to eat meat in order to consume protein, since protein can be consumed by consuming whey, which is made from the milk that cows produce, without needing to be slaughtered.
(If you want to age prematurely and look like an old leather handbag as quickly as possible, then eat as much meat as possible and as few vegetables as possible.
Your degraded appearance will constitute the revenge of the animals you have eaten upon you.
If you want to end up looking like a supermodel, then consume protein via whey, carbohydrates via grains (such as oats for breakfast, bread in sandwiches for lunch and brown rice for dinner), as much fruit in the afternoon as possible and as many steamed vegetables (especially green beans) for dinner as possible, in order to improve the health of your skin (including your scalp) and consequently the hair on your head (which grows out of your scalp), which both benefit so much from your consumption of as many steamed vegetables (especially green beans) for dinner as possible.)
Casual observation of animals of all types leads to the inescapable conclusion that animals depend on human beings to serve and protect their best interests.
Human beings should not let animals down by callously resorting to animal cruelty (such as live export), which shows a demonic disregard for the welfare of animals that have been created by God and are obviously sentient beings, who are overtly harmed by their experience of physical injury and associated physical pain, as well as their experience of psychological injury and associated psychological pain.
Banning live export immediately in Australia will save those who practice live export in Australia from retribution by God, on account of their practice of animal cruelty in Australia via live export of animals He has created.
The mistreatment of animals in Australia over preceding decades has been egregious and appalling, so that it is likely that Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia are predominantly responsible for it.
Energy
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Coal should be used to generate electricity in Australia.
Electricity generation and distribution in Australia should be owned and operated by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens in the form of a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Electricity”, which operates on a not-for-profit basis in order to minimise the price of the electricity it generates and distributes for the benefit of Australian citizens.
Australian Electricity should be funded via the electricity bills that Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities receive from Australian Electricity and pay for the electricity generated and distributed by Australian Electricity that they consume.
Australian Electricity should not seek to generate profits in the course of its operation under any circumstances.
However, it will be necessary for Australian Electricity to seek to generate operating surpluses in the course of its operation, in order to fund expansion of its electricity generation and distribution infrastructure as required, so that it will not be necessary for Australian Electricity to be funded via Goods and Services Tax (GST) collected by the Australian federal government.
(It is permissible for the Australian Bank to lend money to Australian Electricity as required if Australian Electricity has a deficit of funds, which can be repaid by Australian Electricity to the Australian Bank using the funds it receives as a result of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities paying their electricity bills to Australian Electricity.)
Solar panels can be used by the private sector (i.e. Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities) to generate electricity in Australia but should not be used by the public sector (i.e. Australian federal, state, territorial and local governments) to generate electricity in Australia.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the excessive levels of noise that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia produce and the damage that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia inflict upon wildlife, namely birds, by injuring and killing them.
Natural gas should be used for cooking, heating and transportation in Australia, as well as industrial requirements in Australia (such as manufacturing requirements in Australia) but should not be used to generate electricity in Australia, unless there are compelling reasons to do so.
‘Carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is a fraud.
Carbon dioxide exists in the earth’s atmosphere at less than 400 parts per million (ie. 0.04% or 4% of 1%), which is less than 1 part per 2,500. Therefore it is manifestly obvious that carbon dioxide does not influence the temperature of the atmosphere to any appreciable extent. In short, carbon dioxide emissions are not causing ‘global warming’, nor has it even been proven that ‘global warming’ is occurring.
‘Climate change’, which used to be called ‘global warming’, is a fraud designed to provide another excuse to set up world government on the basis that “it’s not possible to fight climate change unless all countries around the world work together in a co-ordinated manner”. The United Nations aspires to be that world government (as a front for the State of Israel) and is controlled by the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan.
In fact, the fraud of ‘carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is promoted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is part of the World Meteorological Organization, which is one of the fifteen agencies of the United Nations.
(Another agency of the United Nations is the World Health Organization, which is responsible for the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19 and associated mandates, including mask mandates, lock-downs, vaccination mandates and internment.)
The plan of the United Nations is to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in as many countries as possible, such as Australia, by aggressively encouraging these countries to shut down their coal-powered electricity generation. This serves to reduce the quality of life of the citizens of these countries, such as Australian citizens, by removing the civilising influence of coal-powered electricity, on which citizens of these countries depend for their lighting, refrigeration, hot water and communications, to name just four uses of coal-powered electricity out of many.
The United Nations has created this fictitious idea that carbon dioxide emissions are threatening the world’s climate, via its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in order to provide the pretext for a co-ordinated response administered by world government. However the real objective of the United Nations is to strictly dictate what we citizens around the world can and can’t do as we go about our daily lives, in order to disempower us, control us and rule over us as slaves.
‘Carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is the underlying fraudulent rationale to be used as an excuse for world government to regulate, control and dominate the economic and social affairs of all citizens in all countries. The fraud of ‘carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is perfectly suited to this purpose because almost every aspect of our daily lives involves carbon dioxide emissions, either directly or indirectly.
Education
One of the reasons for the crisis in schools in white countries around the world is that the minors who attend them, being citizens of white countries around the world under the age of 18 years, have been treated like adults for decades by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in white countries around the world, who have run schools in white countries around the world for decades.
However, the minors who attend schools in white countries around the world are obviously not adults and should not be treated like adults.
Following is the solution, including shorter classes of 45 minutes in length, less irrelevant, irritating, mind-numbing material to be learned, longer breaks, including 75 minutes of lunchtime, more monitoring of the behaviour of school students and much more punishment of bad behaviour by school students, such as bullying of other school students by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) and other non-white people, in the form of 30 minutes detention during the last 30 minutes of 75 minutes of lunchtime, until such time as their behaviour improves.
Proposed secondary school curriculum…
Communicating with other people is very important.
School students should complete secondary school at the age of 17 years.
Noise
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of playing music at any time of the day or night at any residential property in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of playing music at any time of the day or night in a motor vehicle in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing noise as a result of playing music at any time of the day or night at any non-residential property in Australia without a licence, including retail businesses such as supermarkets, restaurants and cafes and not-for-profit entities, should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
(Churches of Jesus Christ in Australia should be expressly exempt from this civil offence because Christianity is the predominant religion of white Australian citizens but other religious organisations in Australia, such as mosques, Hindu temples, Buddhist temples and synagogues, should not be exempt from this offence because none of Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism and other religions are the predominant religion of white Australian citizens.
Primary schools and secondary schools in Australia should also be expressly exempt from this civil offence because they can be trusted to produce a reasonable level of noise as a result of playing music in the course of the activities that primary school students and secondary school students engage in at primary schools and secondary schools in Australia.)
This is the regulation that occupiers of non-residential properties in Australia provoke, including retail businesses such as supermarkets, which have deliberately and willfully annoyed their customers with noise in Australia as a result of playing music at the direction of Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia, day in, day out, week after week, month after month, year after year and decade after decade, as an intentional form of adverse social engineering, in order to adversely influence the attitudes and behaviour of as many white Australian citizens as possible, who visit these non-residential properties in Australia, including retail businesses such as supermarkets.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of talking, raising one’s voice or shouting without reasonable justification at any time of the day or night in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of deliberately closing a door loudly, including slamming a door closed, without reasonable justification at any time of the day or night in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Motor vehicles in Australia should be required to be engineered so that their exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise.
Motorcycles in Australia should be required to be engineered so that their exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise.
Riders of motorcycles in Australia, who do not feel safe riding motorcycles whose exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise, on account of their presence on the road not being readily identified by motor vehicles around them on the road, should not ride motorcycles.
The volume of sirens used by police motor vehicles (as well as police motorcycles), ambulances and fire engines should be limited, so that they cannot be heard more than 1,000 metres away, in order to limit the disruption they cause to people in their vicinity when they are activated, in the form of excessive levels of noise.
Gasoline-powered (i.e. petrol-powered) leaf blowers in Australia should be required to be engineered so that their exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise.
Producing any noise as a result of using gasoline-powered (i.e. petrol-powered) or electrically-powered gardening equipment, including lawn mowers, trimmers, hedge trimmers, leaf blowers, chainsaws and mulchers, before 8 am or after 6:30 pm on weekdays from Monday to Friday or before 10 am or after 6:30 pm on Saturday or Sunday in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing any noise as a result of using electrically-powered tools, including drills, miter saws, circular saws, jigsaws, sanders, grinders and routers, before 8 am or after 6:30 pm on weekdays from Monday to Friday or before 10 am or after 6:30 pm on Saturday or Sunday in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of using a generator of electricity, whether powered by gasoline (i.e. petrol), diesel or natural gas, before 8 am or after 6:30 pm on weekdays from Monday to Friday or before 10 am or after 6:30 pm on Saturday or Sunday in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the excessive levels of noise that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia produce.
Political Donations
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Donations to political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia should be restricted by law to donations by Australian citizens, not businesses or other entities (such as not-for-profit entities) in Australia or other countries around the world, since political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia should represent Australian citizens, not businesses or other entities (such as not-for-profit entities) in Australia or other countries around the world.
There should be no restrictions on the individual value of donations that political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia can receive from Australian citizens.
There should be no restrictions on the total value of donations that political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia can receive from Australian citizens.
Political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia should be required by law to declare the amount of every donation they receive that is greater than an appropriate threshold, such as $100, as well as the source of every donation they receive that is greater than that appropriate threshold, such as $100, identifiable by the legal name of that source, being an Australian citizen, so that Australian citizens can find out which Australian citizens are potentially influencing the decision-making processes of political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia.
Trade
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The subject of trade conducted by Australia with other countries around the world lends itself to the formulation of various algorithmic rules.
~ Australia should not levy any tariffs on imports from other white countries around the world, such as Britain, unless those imports from other white countries around the world are harming its industries or industrial development to the detriment of the best interests of Australian citizens.
~ Australia should consider levying reciprocal tariffs on imports from other white countries around the world which levy tariffs on imports from Australia.
~ Australia should not levy any tariffs on imports from allied, non-white countries around the world, such as Japan, unless those imports from allied, non-white countries around the world are harming its industries or industrial development to the detriment of the best interests of Australian citizens.
~ Australia should consider levying reciprocal tariffs on imports from allied, non-white countries around the world which levy tariffs on imports from Australia.
~ Australia should levy tariffs on imports from non-allied, non-white countries around the world, such as India, unless those imports from non-allied, non-white countries around the world are not harming its industries or industrial development to the detriment of the best interests of Australian citizens.
~ Australia should consider levying reciprocal tariffs on imports from non-allied, non-white countries around the world which levy tariffs on imports from Australia.
~ Australia should suspend trade, including all exports and all imports, with hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as China, in order to weaken them economically and politically, until such time as they are no longer hostile towards Australia.
Following is a list of white countries around the world (whose estimated populations are shown):
Ireland – 5 million
Northern Ireland – 2 million
Scotland – 5 million
England – 56 million
Wales – 3 million
France – 67 million
Belgium – 11 million
Netherlands – 17 million
Germany – 83 million
Switzerland – 10 million
Liechtenstein – less than 1 million
Austria – 9 million
Czech Republic – 11 million
Poland – 38 million
Lithuania – 3 million
Latvia – 2 million
Estonia – 1 million
Finland – 6 million
Sweden – 10 million
Norway – 5 million
Denmark – 6 million
Iceland – less than 1 million
Ukraine – 41 million
Russia – 146 million
United States of America – 340 million
Canada – 38 million
Australia – 27 million
New Zealand – 5 million
White people are descendants of Jacob and the Israelites.