By Andrew Mackinnon
Last updated: 24th September, 2025
Equitable Allocation of Spending
Discussion
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The Australian federal government should operate a discussion forum on the internet as an Australian federal government service to Australian citizens.
Australian citizens have little say in the direction in which the Australian federal government takes Australia and have had little say for decades.
Australian citizens urgently need a formal, structured mechanism for making their views known to the Australian federal government about policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) that necessarily affect their interests as Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation.
In the interests of protecting and enhancing democracy in Australia,
the Australian federal government should operate a discussion forum on the internet as an Australian federal government service to Australian citizens,
which is exclusively concerned with policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) that necessarily affect their interests as Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation,
so that Australian citizens can participate in such a discussion forum on the internet, in order to
make their views known on policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) and
discuss policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) with other Australian citizens,
as a means of effectively and efficiently informing their
elected Australian representatives in the Australian federal parliament and Australian federal government employees in Australian federal government services (collectively known as the Australian Public Service (APS), ideally named the “Australian Civil Service (ACS)”)
of their views as Australian citizens regarding policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government).
Since such a discussion forum on the internet would be operated by the Australian federal government, Australian citizens would hopefully be motivated to participate in good faith and ensure that the views they make known and the discussions they conduct conform to high standards of integrity.
Obviously, it would be in the best interests of Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to make their views known and conduct discussions in the best possible manner, in order to convince other Australian citizens participating in such a discussion forum on the internet to adopt their views.
However, by enabling Australian citizens to discuss policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) with each other, such a discussion forum on the internet would provide Australian citizens with opportunities to learn from the views of other Australian citizens about policy, legislation and issues (associated with the Australian federal government) and adjust their own views when they realise that the views of other Australian citizens better serve the interests of Australian citizens and the health of Australia as a nation.
The name of this discussion forum on the internet could be “Australian Discussion”.
The website for this discussion forum on the internet could be “australian-discussion.gov.au”.
Abortion
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Criminalise abortion in Australia, with the limited exception of:
~ abortions of conceptions arising from sexual assault, including rape and paedophilia
~ abortions of conceptions arising from incest
Pornography
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Criminalise the production of pornography and the distribution of pornography in Australia in all forms, including magazines, videos, DVDs and websites and web pages on the internet, since freedom of speech only legitimately applies to the spoken or written word, as a means of preventing Australian citizens from viewing pornography, on the basis that viewing pornography is harmful to Australian citizens and therefore harmful to the health of Australia as a nation.
In practice, the only way for the Australian federal government to effectively and efficiently criminalise the distribution of pornography in Australia in all forms, including magazines, videos, DVDs and websites and web pages on the internet, is for an Australian federal government entity to maintain a list of websites and web pages that are banned by the Australian federal government from being viewed by Australian citizens, on the grounds that these websites and web pages contain pornography, so that all internet service providers in Australia have clear guidance from the Australian federal government in the form of this list about which websites and web pages they need to prevent Australian citizens from accessing, when providing internet access to Australian citizens, in order to comply with the criminalisation of the distribution of pornography in Australia by the Australian federal government.
Since the Australian federal government should want to ban other websites and web pages on the internet from being viewed by Australian citizens, such as websites and web pages associated with various types of criminality, it is very important that the list of websites and web pages banned by the Australian federal government from being viewed by Australian citizens is segmented by appropriate categories, such as “Drug Use”, “Pornography” and “Violence”.
It is also very important that the list of websites and web pages banned by the Australian federal government from being viewed by Australian citizens is publicly available to Australian citizens, so that they can be confident that the Australian federal government is not banning websites and web pages that Australian citizens have legitimate rights to access.
For your consideration…
Migration
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
(i.e. “Australian Migration”, comprising “Australian Immigration”, “Australian Detention”, “Australian Relocation”, “Australian Deportation” and “Australian Repatriation”)
Very soon after I finished Year 12 in secondary school in late 1990, I was sitting in traffic on a Friday afternoon in Sydney, New South Wales, which was banked up a long way. It was an eye-opening welcome for me as a secondary school leaver to adult life in Australia.
The last time traffic in Sydney, New South Wales was free of congestion was in about 1979, when the size of the population of Australia was about 14 million, so I would obviously like to see the size of the population of Australia decrease from the current circa 27.8 million to as close as possible to 14 million, as a result of
banning non-white immigration into Australia,
limiting immigration into Australia over the course of any given financial year to 0.10% (i.e. one-thousandth) of the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of that financial year,
forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan, since their ancestors lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ,
deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds) back to their countries of origin and
repatriating non-white Australian citizens, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin.
Immigration
(i.e. “Australian Immigration”)
Ban immigration of non-white people into Australia.
Non-white people include Jews (i.e. Edomites), Africans, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, Indians, Nepalese, Chinese, other Asians, Pacific Islanders, Arabs, Greeks and Italians.
Estimated ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia…
100.0% – Population of Australia – 27.8 million (largely known)
2.9% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million (largely known)
40.6% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 11.3 million (unknown)
29.5% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 8.2 million (unknown)
11.5% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.2 million (unknown)
84.5% – All ethnicities – Australian citizens – 23.5 million (largely known)
9.0% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Temporary visas – 2.5 million (largely known)
6.5% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Permanent residents – 1.8 million (largely known by deduction)
Notes…
The size of the population of Australia in 2025 is estimated to be 27,829,800.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia
There are an estimated 18,432,193 Australian citizens who are eligible to be enrolled to vote in Australian federal elections and Australian federal referendums in 2025.
aec.gov.au/enrolling_to_vote/enrolment_stats/ (halfway down the web page)
Life expectancy in Australia is 83.1 years.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Australia
Since only Australian citizens aged 18 years or over are allowed to vote in Australian federal elections, an estimate of the total number of Australian citizens, including Australian citizens aged less than 18 years, is:
18,432,193 divided by ( 65.1 / 83.1 ) equals 23,528,652
Australia – Population and Demographic Data – 1900 to 2024
Non-white immigration into Australia causes:
~ higher prices of goods (e.g. groceries), services (e.g. residential properties for rent) and assets (e.g. residential properties) in Australia, being inflation, due to increased demand for goods, services and assets resulting from more people living in Australia
~ lower wages and salaries in Australia due to increased supply of labour resulting from more people living in Australia
~ higher unemployment in Australia due to increased supply of labour resulting from more people living in Australia
~ increased congestion on roads and public transport in Australia resulting from more people living in Australia
~ the resources of Australia (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera) to be shared among more people living in Australia, so that the share of these resources per white Australian citizen decreases, thereby making white Australian citizens less prosperous
Therefore, the purpose of non-white immigration into Australia is to diminish the quality of life of white Australian citizens and replace them with non-white immigrants to Australia.
Ban immigration of white people who cannot read and write the native language of Australia, being English, into Australia, since it will not be readily possible for them to learn to speak the native language of Australia, being English, in Australia.
Only allow immigration of white people who can read and write the native language of Australia, being English, into Australia, since it will be readily possible for them to learn to speak the native language of Australia, being English, in Australia.
Limit immigration into Australia to predominantly white people originating from white countries around the world (not predominantly Jewish (i.e. predominantly Edomitish) people originating from white countries around the world), who can read and write the native language of Australia, being English, since it will therefore be readily possible for them to learn to speak the native language of Australia, being English, in Australia, including the following white countries around the world (whose estimated populations are shown):
Ireland – 5 million
Northern Ireland – 2 million
Scotland – 5 million
England – 56 million
Wales – 3 million
France – 67 million
Belgium – 11 million
Netherlands – 17 million
Germany – 83 million
Switzerland – 10 million
Liechtenstein – less than 1 million
Austria – 9 million
Czech Republic – 11 million
Poland – 38 million
Lithuania – 3 million
Latvia – 2 million
Estonia – 1 million
Finland – 6 million
Sweden – 10 million
Norway – 5 million
Denmark – 6 million
Iceland – less than 1 million
Ukraine – 41 million
Russia – 146 million
United States of America – 331 million
Canada – 38 million
Australia – 27 million
New Zealand – 5 million
In any given financial year, from 1st July to the following 30th June, one year later, immigration into Australia over the course of that financial year should not exceed 0.10% (i.e. one-thousandth) of the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of that financial year.
For example, if the number of Australian citizens living in Australia at the start of any given financial year is 23.5 million, then immigration into Australia over the course of that financial year should not exceed 0.10% of 23.5 million, being 23,500 people.
Australia – Population and Demographic Data – 1900 to 2024
Detention
(i.e. “Australian Detention”, being detention of illegal immigrants to Australia)
The Australian federal government should minimise its spending on Australian Detention to the greatest extent possible, by using aircraft and personnel from the Australian Air Force to fly illegal immigrants to Australia back to their countries of origin, under guard and under threat of force (that is appropriate for the interior of aircraft), as quickly as possible after they have been apprehended by Australian Border Force.
This strategy would send a strong message of deterrence to any citizens of other countries around the world who are considering immigrating to Australia illegally, such as by boat.
Relocation
(i.e. “Australian Relocation”)
Forcibly relocate Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan, since their ancestors lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ.
Jewish people are descendants of Esau and the Edomites.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakhstan
Estimated ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia…
100.0% – Population of Australia – 27.8 million (largely known)
2.9% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million (largely known)
40.6% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 11.3 million (unknown)
29.5% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 8.2 million (unknown)
11.5% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.2 million (unknown)
84.5% – All ethnicities – Australian citizens – 23.5 million (largely known)
9.0% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Temporary visas – 2.5 million (largely known)
6.5% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Permanent residents – 1.8 million (largely known by deduction)
Forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current circa 27.8 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for goods, services and assets in Australia, including demand for groceries, residential properties for rent and residential properties, thereby causing prices of goods, services and assets in Australia to decrease, including prices of groceries, rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties, as well as freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) who are currently living in Australia.
Forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing wages and salaries of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia, resulting in more space per person in Australia.
Forcibly relocating Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia to Kazakhstan will also result in fewer people living in Australia and sharing Australia’s resources (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera), so that there will be more resources per person in Australia, making everybody in Australia more prosperous.
Deportation
(i.e. “Australian Deportation”)
Deport non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), back to their countries of origin.
Estimated ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia…
100.0% – Population of Australia – 27.8 million (largely known)
2.9% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million (largely known)
40.6% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 11.3 million (unknown)
29.5% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 8.2 million (unknown)
11.5% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.2 million (unknown)
84.5% – All ethnicities – Australian citizens – 23.5 million (largely known)
9.0% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Temporary visas – 2.5 million (largely known)
6.5% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Permanent residents – 1.8 million (largely known by deduction)
Non-white non-citizens of Australia, numbering circa 4.3 million, include Jews (i.e. Edomities), Africans, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans, Indians, Nepalese, Chinese, other Asians, Pacific Islanders, Arabs, Greeks and Italians.
However, Jews (i.e. Edomites) do not have countries of origin because they are skilled in wrecking countries, not building countries.
Deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering circa 4.3 million, back to their countries of origin will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current circa 27.8 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for goods, services and assets in Australia, including demand for groceries, residential properties for rent and residential properties, thereby causing prices of goods, services and assets in Australia to decrease, including prices of groceries, rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties, as well as freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the circa 4.3 million non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds) who are currently living in Australia.
Deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering circa 4.3 million, back to their countries of origin will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing wages and salaries of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia, resulting in more space per person in Australia.
Deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds), numbering circa 4.3 million, back to their countries of origin will also result in fewer people living in Australia and sharing Australia’s resources (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera), so that there will be more resources per person in Australia, making everybody in Australia more prosperous.
Repatriation
(i.e. “Australian Repatriation”)
(repatriate: “to send a person back to the country of his or her birth or citizenship”)
Repatriate non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens who originate from Sri Lanka and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens who originate from Papua New Guinea), on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin.
Estimated ethnic composition and citizenship composition of Australia…
100.0% – Population of Australia – 27.8 million (largely known)
2.9% – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 0.8 million (largely known)
40.6% – White (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 11.3 million (unknown)
29.5% – Non-white (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 8.2 million (unknown)
11.5% – Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) (predominantly) – Australian citizens – 3.2 million (unknown)
84.5% – All ethnicities – Australian citizens – 23.5 million (largely known)
9.0% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Temporary visas – 2.5 million (largely known)
6.5% – Assumed-non-white (predominantly) – Non-citizens of Australia – Permanent residents – 1.8 million (largely known by deduction)
Non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens), numbering in the order of 12.2 million, include Jews (i.e. Edomites), Africans, Pakistanis, Sri Lankans (including Aborigines), Indians, Nepalese, Chinese, other Asians, Pacific Islanders (including Torres Strait Islanders), Arabs, Greeks and Italians.
Jews (i.e. Edomites) do not have countries of origin because they are skilled in wrecking countries, not building countries. However, Jews (i.e. Edomites) can be repatriated, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, to Kazakhstan, since their ancestors lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ.
Offer non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens), numbering in the order of 12.2 million, amounts of money, such as $7,500 AUD for adults and $3,750 AUD for minors, to voluntarily relinquish their Australian citizenship and return to their countries of origin.
Repatriating non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens), numbering in the order of 12.2 million, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin will reduce the size of the population of Australia from its current circa 27.8 million people, thereby significantly reducing demand for goods, services and assets in Australia, including demand for groceries, residential properties for rent and residential properties, thereby causing prices of goods, services and assets in Australia to decrease, including prices of groceries, rents for residential properties and prices of residential properties, as well as freeing up a large number of residential properties for Australian citizens to occupy, instead of the in the order of 12.2 million non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens) who are currently living in Australia.
Repatriating non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens), numbering in the order of 12.2 million, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin will also reduce the supply of labour in Australia, causing wages and salaries of Australian citizens to increase and unemployment in Australia to decrease, as well as reduce congestion on the roads in Australia, congestion on public transport in Australia and congestion in general in Australia, resulting in more space per person in Australia.
Repatriating non-white Australian citizens (including Aboriginal Australian citizens and Torres Strait Islander Australian citizens), numbering in the order of 12.2 million, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin will also result in fewer people living in Australia and sharing Australia’s resources (i.e. land, water, food, construction materials, houses, apartments, coal, minerals, natural gas, motor vehicles, bicycles, et cetera), so that there will be more resources per person in Australia, making everybody in Australia more prosperous.
Punishment and Correction
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
(i.e. “Australian Punishment and Correction”, comprising “Australian Executions”, “Australian Prisons” and “Australian Orders”)
Executions
(i.e. “Australian Executions”)
Reintroduce capital punishment in Australia, involving death by hanging for convicted perpetrators of capital crimes in Australia, being treason (e.g. knowingly perpetrating election fraud or knowingly perpetrating the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, sexual assault (e.g. paedophilia or rape), aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson.
There is no reason why the perpetration of these capital crimes in Australia should result in an obligation by taxpayers in Australia to fund the imprisonment of the perpetrators, which involves supplying them with water, food, clothing and shelter for several years while they are imprisoned.
Capital punishment involving death by hanging for convicted perpetrators of capital crimes in Australia provides an ominous warning to Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia that if they commit a capital crime in Australia and are convicted in court, they will be executed, irrespective of their ethnicity, whether white, Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander, Arab, Indian, Chinese, other Asian, Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) or any other ethnicity.
Convicted perpetrators of capital crimes in Australia should be executed by hanging in public, so that interested Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia can gather and watch.
These hangings in public should be video-recorded and the resulting videos should be published on the internet, so that interested Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia who are not able to gather and watch these hangings in public can watch these hangings on the internet.
Obviously these hangings in public and their video-recordings published on the internet would provide a strong deterrent to Australian citizens in Australia and non-citizens of Australia in Australia against committing capital crimes in Australia, being treason (e.g. knowingly perpetrating election fraud or knowingly perpetrating the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19), murder, sexual assault (e.g. paedophilia or rape), aggravated assault, kidnapping, gang stalking and arson.
Prisons
(i.e. “Australian Prisons”)
Convicted perpetrators of threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as common assault, should be incarcerated in prisons in Australia, whose purpose should be to rehabilitate convicted perpetrators of threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as common assault, so that they become worthwhile Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia upon their release from prisons in Australia.
Orders
(i.e. “Australian Orders”)
Convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia should be subject to community-based orders in Australia, in order to rehabilitate convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, so that they become worthwhile Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia upon the conclusion of the community-based orders to which they are subject.
Convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, who are subject to community-based orders, should be made to wear highly visible security rings around their necks, whose colours indicate the types of non-threatening non-capital crimes committed by their wearers, such as red for theft, for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject, which would obviously provide a powerful and effective deterrent against Australian citizens and non-citizens of Australia committing non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, on account of the social stigma of wearing highly visible security rings around their necks which identify them as convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia and indicate by their colours which types of non-threatening non-capital crimes, such as theft, they have committed.
The objective is obviously to dramatically reduce the incidence of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft.
It is alarming that business owners in Australia, such as retailers, and residential property owners in Australia, such as owner-occupiers, are spending literally hundreds of millions of dollars every year in Australia, in order to secure their property against the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia, when the Australian federal government could spend a fraction of that amount to dramatically reduce the incidence of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia by requiring that convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, wear highly visible security rings around their necks for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject.
Instead of retailers in Australia spending an enormous amount of money every year to lock valuable merchandise up in their stores and thereby protect their stores against the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia, the Australian federal government could spend a fraction of that amount to dramatically reduce the incidence of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia by locking highly visible security rings around the necks of convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as theft, for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject.
This idea of requiring that convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia wear highly visible security rings for the duration of the community-based orders to which they are subject would enable prisons in Australia to only be used to incarcerate convicted perpetrators of threatening non-capital crimes in Australia, such as common assault.
Community-based orders should require that convicted perpetrators of non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia make restitution, including financial payments, to the victims of their non-threatening non-capital crimes in Australia.
For example, convicted perpetrators of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia should be required by the community-based orders to which they are subject to return the stolen goods or stolen money to their owners or pay the equivalent value to their owners, as well as pay whatever amounts to their owners that the judiciary in Australia decides upon as restitution.
Once convicted perpetrators of the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft in Australia have met the requirements of the community-based orders to which they are subject, the highly visible security rings around their necks, coloured red to indicate the non-threatening non-capital crime of theft, would be removed.
Mandatory Sentencing
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Committing home invasion in Australia is a heinous crime, which should attract a criminal conviction and a mandatory sentence of imprisonment of ten (10) years duration, involving an appropriate intensity of labour.
If another crime is committed or other crimes are committed in the course of committing home invasion in Australia, it should obviously attract an additional sentence or they should obviously attract additional sentences that increase the duration of imprisonment for a convicted perpetrator of the crime of committing home invasion in Australia beyond ten (10) years, unless the other crime that is committed is a capital crime (e.g. murder, sexual assault or aggravated assault) or at least one of the other crimes that are committed is a capital crime (e.g. murder, sexual assault or aggravated assault), in which case the convicted perpetrator should be executed by hanging.
Deliberately damaging or defacing public property or private property in Australia, such as via graffiti, is a very serious crime, which should attract a criminal conviction and a mandatory sentence of a community-based order of three (3) years duration, involving an appropriate intensity of labour.
A community-based order of two (2) years duration does not provide sufficient deterrence to potential perpetrators of the crime of deliberately damaging or defacing public property or private property in Australia and is not enough time to re-educate a person who has decided that he or she is entitled to deliberately damage or deface public property or private property in Australia.
Therefore, a mandatory sentence of a community-based order of three (3) years duration, involving an appropriate intensity of labour, for deliberately damaging or defacing public property or private property in Australia, is required.
Deliberately littering in Australia is a serious crime, which should attract a criminal conviction and a mandatory sentence of a community-based order of two (2) years duration, involving picking up litter in Australia for 30 hours per week for the minimum wage, with all of the usual entitlements to public holidays and four weeks of annual leave per year.
This punishment for deliberately littering in Australia should be sufficient to re-educate a person who deliberately litters in Australia, so that they never deliberately litter in Australia again.
The ultimate objective of this punishment for the crime of deliberately littering in Australia is not to ruin the lives of convicted perpetrators of this crime but deter people from deliberately littering in Australia.
Deliberately littering in Australia is an overtly anti-social act that negatively impacts other people living in Australia in a pervasive manner, by degrading the built and natural environments of Australia, so that it warrants this kind of serious punishment.
Normal people living in Australia, who view the act of deliberately littering in Australia with abhorrence, obviously have nothing to fear.
Banking
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Australia needs a publicly owned, federal “Australian Bank” that lends to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, for mortgages, personal loans, business loans of all types and sizes and loans of all types and sizes to not-for-profit entities, without charging any interest on this lending to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
However, various rates of around 1% or less would need to be charged by the Australian Bank on all lending by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, in order to cover the various incidences of default on loans to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
This Australian Bank should operate on a not-for-profit basis and cover its operating costs by charging account-keeping fees and transaction fees, paid by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, who and which use the Australian Bank, which account-keeping fees and transaction fees should be limited to covering the actual costs incurred by the Australian Bank to administer the accounts of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities and to process the transactions of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
Money is created when the Australian Bank lends to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, so that the money supply in Australia increases.
(The Australian Bank debits its “Loans” account on the assets side of its balance sheet for the amount lent to signify the debt owing to it and credits its “Deposits” account on the liability side of its balance sheet to provide its customer with the amount it has lent to them, so that the customer can utilise those funds in the bank account that the customer holds with the bank.)
Money is destroyed when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay principal on loans they owe to the Australian Bank, so that the money supply in Australia decreases.
(The Australian Bank debits its “Deposits” account on the liability side of its balance sheet for the amount of principal repaid, which reduces the customer’s bank account by the same amount, as well as credits its “Loans” account on the assets side of its balance sheet for the amount of principal repaid, which reduces the amount owing by the customer to the Australian Bank.)
Therefore, when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities borrow more money per unit time from the Australian Bank than Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay per unit time to the Australian Bank, such as when the total amounts of money lent by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities increase as multiples of their respective incomes, profits and operating surpluses, the money supply in Australia increases.
Therefore, when Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities borrow less money per unit time from the Australian Bank than Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities repay per unit time to the Australian Bank, such as when the total amounts of money lent by the Australian Bank to Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities decrease as multiples of their respective incomes, profits and operating surpluses, the money supply in Australia decreases.
The size of the money supply in Australia can be increased and decreased to control inflation by increasing and decreasing the total amounts of principal that the Australian Bank is allowed to lend to Australian citizens, Australian businesses (such as sole traders, partnerships and companies) and Australian not-for-profit entities (such as churches and charities), expressed as higher and lower multiples of the incomes of Australian citizens, profits of Australian businesses and operating surpluses of Australian not-for-profit entities.
These multiples should be different for different types of borrowers, such as Australian citizens, Australian businesses (including sole traders, partnerships and companies) and Australian not-for-profit entities (including churches and charities).
For example, the Australian Bank could be limited to lending 4.0 times the income of any given Australian citizen, so that the total borrowing of that Australian citizen, such as including a mortgage and a personal loan, is not allowed to exceed 4.0 times the income of that Australian citizen.
For any given married couple of Australian citizens, the Australian Bank could be limited to lending 4.0 times their combined income, so that the total borrowing of that married couple of Australian citizens, such as including a mortgage and personal loans, is not allowed to exceed 4.0 times the combined income of that married couple of Australian citizens.
The analog of interest-only loans, being loans with no repayments whatsoever until repayment of the entire principal of the loan, would not be allowed by the Australian Bank under any circumstances.
Once the Australian federal government has established the publicly owned Australian Bank, ban the Australian federal government from incurring Australian federal government debt that is owed to any entity other than the Australian Bank.
An ideal way for the Australian federal government to meet the costs of specific projects (e.g. a freeway) and specific purposes (e.g. expansion of the postal activities of Australia Post, ideally named “Australian Post”), which can be recovered from their end-user Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, in the form of various types of fees paid on user-pays bases by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, is for the Australian federal government to borrow the money required for such specific projects and specific purposes from the Australian Bank on the understanding that the Australian federal government will collect such fees paid on user-pays bases by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities and use those fees to repay the money borrowed from the Australian Bank.
(Just one example is the Australian federal government borrowing from the Australian Bank to build a freeway and recovering the cost from its end-users, being Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entites, in the form of tolls paid to use the freeway, in order to repay the money borrowed over time, typically a number of years.
Once the money borrowed has been repaid, the tolls to use the freeway should no longer be charged.
Other examples of fees paid on user-pays bases by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities are electricity bills, telephone bills and the prices of processed resources ideally produced by the Australian federal government, such as steel, aluminium, copper, et cetera.)
Note that it is important that such borrowing from the Australian Bank is repaid, since borrowing from the Australian Bank causes the size of the money supply in Australia to increase.
If such borrowing from the Australian Bank is not repaid, then the money supply in Australia will tend to increase in size in an uncontrolled manner as the Australian Bank lends more money for various purposes over time, thereby causing prices of goods (e.g. groceries), services (e.g. residential properties for rent) and assets (e.g. residential properties) in Australia to increase, being inflation.
(Unrestrained lending by the privately owned banks in Australia to buyers of residential properties in Australia, both as owner-occupiers and investors, as multiples of their incomes that are far in excess of what is prudent, has undoubtedly caused inflation in Australia for decades, without even being detected and identified as a serious problem.)
The Australian federal government borrowing from the Australian Bank for specific projects and specific purposes and repaying the money borrowed via fees paid on user-pays bases by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities is a powerful form of economic management which must be exercised by the Australian federal government in a disciplined manner.
The Australian federal government should only undertake such borrowing if it is certain that it can repay such borrowing via such fees paid on user-pays bases by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities.
Such borrowing must not be so great that it will cause the size of the money supply in Australia to increase excessively, thereby causing inflation in Australia.
The Australian federal government must be completely transparent with Australian citizens about such borrowing on a project-by-project and a purpose-by-purpose basis, so that Australian citizens can see exactly how much the Australian federal government has borrowed on a project-by-project and purpose-by-purpose basis, how much of the fees paid on user-pays bases by Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities constitute repayments of such borrowing and how much of such borrowing the Australian federal government is yet to repay.
Borrowing by the Australian federal government must NOT be allowed to get out of control.
Transparency by the Australian federal government with the millions of Australian citizens is the key to preventing borrowing by the Australian federal government from getting out of control.
Taxation
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The only Australian federal government tax should be Goods and Services Tax (GST).
Goods and Services Tax should be charged by the Australian federal government at a flat rate of 25% on all goods and services produced in Australia and sold in Australia, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods, in order to facilitate efficient administration of Goods and Services Tax by Australian citizens, Australian businesses, Australian not-for-profit entities and Australian federal government entities.
Goods and Services Tax should not be charged on second-hand goods under any circumstances.
There should be no other exceptions to Goods and Services Tax under any circumstances, including food and rent, in order to facilitate efficient administration of Goods and Services Tax by Australian citizens, Australian businesses, Australian not-for-profit entities and Australian federal government entities.
The Goods and Services Tax should only ever be allowed by the Australian Government to be charged at a flat rate.
This restriction on the rate of the Goods and Services Tax to a flat rate should be legislated by the Australian Government.
The flat rate of the Goods and Services Tax should never be allowed by the Australian Government to exceed 25%.
This restriction on the flat rate of the Goods and Services Tax to a maximum of 25% should be legislated by the Australian Government.
Consider an Australian citizen who has a lawn mowing business in Australia and earns $50 (excluding GST) mowing a customer’s lawn, while incurring $8 (excluding GST) in expenses, including gasoline, in order to mow that lawn.
They would charge the customer $50 plus $12.50 in Goods and Services Tax at a rate of 25%, totalling $62.50.
They would pay $8 plus $2 in Goods and Services Tax at a rate of 25% for their expenses, totalling $10.
They would owe the Australian federal government $10.50 (i.e. $12.50 – $2) in Goods and Services Tax and earn $42 (i.e. $62.50 – $10 – $10.50 or $50 – $8) in net income after tax.
Goods and Services Tax ensures that the Australian federal government treats all Australian citizens equally, by charging each of them the same flat rate of Goods and Services Tax on the goods and services they buy.
A flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% charged by the Australian federal government on all goods and services produced and sold in Australia, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods, would make all Australian citizens who pay Goods and Services Tax contributors to the operation of Australia and therefore legitimate stakeholders in the Australian federal government.
The Australian federal government would be able to raise circa $275 billion in taxation revenue per year from a Goods and Services Tax charged at a flat rate of 25% on all goods and services produced and sold in Australia, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods.
For details of the calculations performed to arrive at this amount…
(For reasons I do not understand, $275 billion in taxation revenue per year is presumably the same amount that would be raised by the Australian federal government if it charged a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold.)
(Any additional money that the Australian federal government pays to recipients of welfare payments in Australia, in order to cover the higher flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25%, will be received back by the Australian federal government as Goods and Services Tax in amounts that are more or less the same via purchases that these recipients of welfare payments make, on which they necessarily pay Goods and Services Tax at the higher flat rate of 25%.
Therefore, the higher flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% will not result in the Australian federal government needing to effectively increase the amount of taxpayer funds it spends on welfare payments, although it will result in the Australian federal government needing to initially provide additional money, in order to cover the higher flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% paid by recipients of welfare payments in Australia, on a notionally one-off basis, to be used as a permanent float for this purpose that continually decreases (as a result of larger payments made to recipients of welfare payments in Australia, in order to cover the higher flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% that they pay on purchases that they make) and increases (as a result of recipients of welfare payments in Australia paying the higher flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% on purchases that they make, which will be received back by the Australian federal government as Goods and Services Tax).)
How could Australian citizens possibly fund their common needs with a flat rate of Goods and Services Tax of 25% on all goods and services produced and sold in Australia, including food and rent, with no exceptions apart from the obvious exception of second-hand goods, which would raise circa $275 billion in taxation revenue in one year?
Do not provide the businesses responsible for delivering Australian federal government projects with super profits, which are often measured in the billions or even tens of billions of dollars.
Start looking at the largest amounts to find waste in Australian federal government spending and work one’s way down – all the way down.
Australian federal government spending could easily be reduced by more than half with no reduction in the quality of Australian federal government services provided.
For further explanation…
Abolish income tax, since income tax is inequitable and therefore intolerable.
For example, even with a flat rate of income tax of 25% on all income earned by Australian citizens aged 18 years or over, by abolishing the tax-free threshold, somebody earning $120,000 per year pays $30,000 per year in income tax, whereas somebody earning $60,000 per year pays $15,000 per year in income tax.
However, both of these hypothetical somebodies receive the same level of Australian federal government services, despite that the higher-earning somebody pays twice as much income tax as the lower-earning somebody.
This constitutes a large transfer of wealth from the higher-earning somebody to the lower-earning somebody, which is inequitable and therefore intolerable.
Abolish capital gains tax (CGT), since it is a highly offensive violation of property rights of Australian citizens and Australian entities over assets exhibiting capital gains.
Capital gains tax in Australia constitutes less than 10% of all tax revenue collected in Australia by the Australian federal government.
In fact, the percentage of total tax revenue collected by the Australian federal government that is attributable to capital gains tax is so small that I have not been able to find out what this percentage actually is on any Australian federal government website. The Australian federal government has deliberately concealed this information from Australian citizens and Australian entities.
The Australian federal government does not levy capital gains tax on Australian citizens and Australian entities because it needs tax revenue from capital gains tax. The Australian federal government levies capital gains tax on Australian citizens and Australian entities only because it does not want them to have the full capital gains to which they are legitimately entitled. Capital gains should not be taxed under any circumstances.
Capital gains tax is in direct opposition to property rights. With capital gains tax in force, if an Australian citizen saves up some money and then invests it in shares (or any asset), they quite obviously do not have full property rights to the asset they purchased because if they later sell that asset for more than they paid for it, the Australian federal government wants a cut of the capital gain via capital gains tax. If they have full property rights to the asset they purchased, then they can sell that asset and keep the full amount they receive for it without paying any capital gains tax.
An Australian citizen who trades shares in order to make capital gains and who then withdraws a portion of their accumulated capital, in order to fund their living expenses, does not earn any income and should not be taxed on the capital gains they make. Instead, they are consuming a portion of the capital they have accumulated, in order to fund their living expenses.
However, income tax should be abolished, so that there should no longer be any need to tax income anyway.
Abolish fuel tax, which the Australian federal government claims is used to construct and maintain roads in Australia, since all Australian citizens benefit from roads in Australia and the transport of goods they make possible, including those who do not drive motor vehicles, so that the construction and maintenance of roads in Australia should be paid for by the Australian federal government out of Goods and Services Tax.
Abolish all business taxes on business profits generated by businesses in Australia, since business profits should only be taxed after they are paid to the owners of the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax, including dividends paid out of company profits generated by companies in Australia to the shareholders of the companies in Australia who own them.
However, income tax should be abolished, so that there should no longer be any need to tax business profits generated by businesses in Australia after they are paid to the owners of the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax.
There should be no taxes on the profits of businesses in Australia (i.e. sole traders, partnerships, companies, corporations, et cetera), which are distributed to Australian citizens and citizens of other countries who own the businesses in Australia (i.e. proprietors, partners, shareholders, et cetera) as income of those Australian citizens and citizens of other countries, which could then be subject to income tax in Australia and those other countries. This means that the profits of businesses in Australia, which are distributed to the Australian citizens and citizens of other countries who own the businesses in Australia which generated them, should only be taxed once as income of the Australian citizens and citizens of other countries who own the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax.
However, income tax should be abolished, so that there should no longer be any need to tax business profits generated by businesses in Australia after they are paid to the owners of the businesses in Australia which generated them via income tax.
Abolish all other Australian federal government taxes, including the Medicare Levy, with the exception of Goods and Services Tax (GST).
Identity
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
I suspect that the database-driven, administrative systems of the Australian federal government are not operating at their full potential because the Australian federal government presumably lacks a single “Australian Identity Number (AIN)” to represent each Australian citizen in its database-driven, administrative systems (being a primary key for Australian citizens, in the terminology of relational database design and development), thereby leading to poorly designed and poorly functioning database-driven, administrative systems of the Australian federal government.
The solution is to require that all Australian citizens obtain an Australian Identity Card (AIC) compulsorily, which shows their photograph, full name, address, date of birth and Australian Identity Number (AIN) but which contains no electronically stored data, no biometric data and no other data of any type.
There should be no charge by Australian Identity on behalf of the Australian federal government to Australian citizens for obtaining an Australian Identity Card, on account of all Australian citizens being required to obtain an Australian Identity Card compulsorily, so that the cost of Australian Identity providing all Australian citizens with an Australian Identity Card should be funded via Goods and Services Tax.
However, if any Australian citizen loses their Australian Identity Card, they should be required to replace it and they should be charged a fee for replacing their Australian Identity Card on a not-for-profit basis.
Require that all Australian citizens aged 18 years or over prove their identity using their Australian Identity Card, in order to be allowed to vote in Australian federal, state, territorial and local government elections, as well as Australian federal referendums.
Government
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
For further explanation…
Following is a condensed list of proposed Australian federal government services, together with their estimated annual budgets from Goods and Services Tax (GST) in billions (b) of dollars (i.e. thousands of millions of dollars) and their proposed sources of funding:
(Excluding “Australian Infrastructure”, the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars, funded via Goods and Services Tax, of these proposed Australian federal government services is $254.960 billion.
Including “Australian Infrastructure”, which has an estimated annual budget of up to $20.000 billion (i.e. a maximum of $20.000 billion), the total estimated annual budget in billions of dollars of these proposed Australian federal government services, funded via Goods and Services Tax, is up to $274.960 billion (i.e. a maximum of $274.960 billion).)
> $0.050 b – Australian Department of the Governor-General – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.200 b – Australian Discussion – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.500 b – Australian Audit – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Department of Domestic Affairs – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.200 b – Australian Reporting – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.300 b – Australian Department of Domestic Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Elections – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.150 b – Australian Federal Elections – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.150 b – Australian Federal Referendums – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.100 b – Australian Local Elections – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.050 b – Australian Parliament – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.050 b – Australian Parliamentary Services – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Parliamentary Analysis – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.750 b – Australian Forum of Representatives – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Forum of Representatives Services – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.200 b – Australian Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Planning – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.500 b – Australian Excellence – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.400 b – Australian Department of the Attorney-General – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $10.000 b – Australian Police Force – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Judiciary – Partly Goods and Services Tax, partly user pays – Costs
~ $0.150 b – Australian Punishment and Correction – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.010 b – Australian Executions – Goods and Services Tax
– $1.500 b – Australian Prisons – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.250 b – Australian Orders – Partly Goods and Services Tax, partly perpetrator pays – Fines
> $0.150 b – Australian Department of National Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
> $1.000 b – Australian Border Force – Goods and Services Tax
> $1.000 b – Australian Department of Defence – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.500 b – Australian Department of Defence Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Department of Signals Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Department of Geospatial Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Defence Force – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $3.500 b – Australian Marine Force – Goods and Services Tax
– $3.500 b – Australian Air Force – Goods and Services Tax
– $3.500 b – Australian Land Force – Goods and Services Tax
~ $7.500 b – Australian Veterans – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Bank – Not-for-profit – User pays – Account-keeping fees and transaction fees
> $0.050 b – Australian Treasury – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $2.000 b – Australian Taxation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Statistics – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Analysis – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Productivity – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.050 b – Australian Management – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.150 b – Australian Regulation – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.025 b – Australian Auditing Standards – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.025 b – Australian Accounting Standards – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.400 b – Australian Enterprise – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.750 b – Australian Equity – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Insurance – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Securities Exchange – Not-for-profit – User pays – Transaction fees
> $2.500 b – Australian Emergency – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.200 b – Australian Environment – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Animals – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.250 b – Australian Parks – Partly Goods and Services Tax, partly user pays – Fees
> $2.000 b – Australian Roads – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Water – Not-for-profit – User pays – Water bills
> $0.075 b – Australian Agriculture – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.025 b – Australian Fisheries – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.050 b – Australian Forestry – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Mining – Not-for-profit – Entity pays – Transfer prices of extracted resources, including
coal (i.e. thermal coal for electricity generation and coking coal for steel production),
natural gas (from which processed natural gas is produced),
oil (from which petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil are produced),
iron ore (from which steel is produced),
bauxite (from which aluminium is produced),
copper sulfide (from which copper is produced) and
many other minerals and metals,
sold on a not-for-profit basis to other publicly owned Australian federal government entities, including
thermal coal and coking coal to Australian Coal, for the distribution and sale of thermal coal and coking coal,
natural gas to Australian Natural Gas, for the production, distribution and sale of processed natural gas,
oil to Australian Oil, for the production, distribution and sale of petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil,
iron ore to Australian Steel, for the production, distribution and sale of steel,
bauxite to Australian Aluminium, for the production, distribution and sale of aluminium,
copper sulfide to Australian Copper, for the production, distribution and sale of copper,
et cetera
> $0.250 b – Australian Resources – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.000 b – Australian Coal – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Coal prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Natural Gas – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Natural gas prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Oil – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Steel – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Steel prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aluminium – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Aluminium prices
~ $0.000 b – Australian Copper – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Copper prices
~ $0.000 b – Et cetera – Not-for-profit for Australia and other white countries and for-profit for non-white countries – User pays – Et cetera
> $0.050 b – Australian Industry – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.100 b – Australian Manufacturing – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Electricity – Not-for-profit – User pays – Electricity bills
> $0.050 b – Australian Communications – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.150 b – Australian Communications Authority – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.000 b – Australian Telecommunications – Not-for-profit – User pays – Telecommunications bills
~ $0.300 b – Australian Broadcasting – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.000 b – Australian Post – Not-for-profit – User pays – Postage fees
> $0.000 b – Australian Buses – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket prices
> $0.000 b – Australian Railways – Not-for-profit – User pays – Ticket prices and freight fees
> $0.000 b – Australian Ports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Cargo fees
> $0.200 b – Australian Marine – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.000 b – Australian Marine Authority – Not-for-profit – User pays – Fees – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Marine Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays – Marine licence fees
– $0.000 b – Australian Marine Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays – Marine registration fees
~ $0.000 b – Australian Marine Control – Not-for-profit – User pays – Fees
> $0.000 b – Australian Airports – Not-for-profit – User pays – Fees
> $0.200 b – Australian Aviation – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Authority – Not-for-profit – User pays – Fees – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays – Aviation licence fees
– $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays – Aviation registration fees
~ $0.000 b – Australian Aviation Control – Not-for-profit – User pays – Fees
> $0.400 b – Australian Services – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.150 b – Australian Registry – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.400 b – Australian Identity – Goods and Services Tax
~ $0.200 b – Australian Motor – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Licencing – Not-for-profit – User pays – Motor vehicle driver licence fees
– $0.000 b – Australian Motor Registration – Not-for-profit – User pays – Motor vehicle registration fees
~ $0.100 b – Australian Titles – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.000 b – Australian Land Titles – Not for-profit – User pays – Land title fees
– $0.000 b – Australian Residential Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays – Residential property title fees
– $0.000 b – Australian Commercial Property Titles – Not for-profit – User pays – Commercial property title fees
> $0.750 b – Australian Education – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $11.500 b – Australian Primary Education – Goods and Services Tax
~ $11.500 b – Australian Secondary Education – Goods and Services Tax
~ $2.500 b – Australian Technical And Further Education (TAFE) – Half Goods and Services Tax, half user pays – TAFE fees
~ $2.500 b – Australian Tertiary Education – Half Goods and Services Tax, half user pays – University fees
> $20.000 b – Australian Health – Partly Goods and Services Tax, partly user pays – Costs – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
> $0.500 b – Australian Welfare – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.500 b – Australian Elderly – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Elderly Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $63.000 b – Australian Elderly Payments – Goods and Services Tax – NOT means-tested in relation to accumulated assets or income under any circumstances
– $13.500 b – Australian Elderly Care – Partly Goods and Services Tax, partly user pays – Costs – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Disability – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Disability Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $17.000 b – Australian Disability Payments – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested in relation to income, NOT accumulated assets under any circumstances, to minimise cost incurred
– $12.500 b – Australian Disability Scheme – Partly Goods and Services Tax, partly user pays – Costs – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.250 b – Australian Carers – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.250 b – Australian Carer Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $10.000 b – Australian Carer Payments – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Children – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Child Protection – Goods and Services Tax
– $0.500 b – Australian Child Carer Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $10.000 b – Australian Child Carer Payments – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested to minimise cost incurred
~ $0.500 b – Australian Unemployment – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
– $0.500 b – Australian Unemployment Support – Goods and Services Tax
– $14.000 b – Australian Unemployment Payments – Goods and Services Tax – Means-tested in relation to income, NOT accumulated assets under any circumstances, to minimise cost incurred
> Up to $20.000 b – Australian Infrastructure – Goods and Services Tax
Necessary infrastructure which cannot be funded via $20.000 billion of Goods and Services Tax each year will need to be funded via borrowing from the publicly owned Australian Bank, which will need to be repaid via fees charged by the Australian federal government to Australian citizens to use this infrastructure on a user-pays basis.
> $0.800 b – Australian Department of Foreign Affairs – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.300 b – Australian Department of Foreign Intelligence – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.400 b – Australian Trade – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.100 b – Australian Tourism – Goods and Services Tax
> $0.150 b – Australian Migration – Goods and Services Tax – Comprising:
~ $0.025 b – Australian Immigration – Half Goods and Services Tax, half user pays – Immigration fees
~ $0.750 b – Australian Detention – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Relocation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $1.000 b – Australian Deportation – Goods and Services Tax
~ $4.000 b – Australian Repatriation – Goods and Services Tax
Following is a condensed list of proposed Australian local government services, together with their proposed sources of funding:
> Australian Local Government – Discussion – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Council – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Environment – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Planning – Partly rates, partly user pays – Fees
> Australian Local Government – Roads – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Paths – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Parks – Rates
> Australian Local Government – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly rates, partly user pays – Fees
> Australian Local Government – Facilities – Partly rates, partly user pays – Fees
For example:
> Brisbane City Government – Discussion – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Council – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Environment – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Planning – Partly rates, partly user pays – Fees
> Brisbane City Government – Roads – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Paths – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Parks – Rates
> Brisbane City Government – Rubbish & Recycling – Partly rates, partly user pays – Fees
> Brisbane City Government – Facilities – Partly rates, partly user pays – Fees
Australian local government rates for individual properties in Australian local government areas should not be calculated on the basis of property values in Australian local government areas, since property values in Australian local government areas have nothing whatsoever to do with the level of Australian local government services provided to the Australian citizens who use the individual properties.
Australian local government rates for individual properties in Australian local government areas should be calculated on the basis of the level of Australian local government services provided to individual properties, such as according to the number of Australian citizens who use the individual properties and their ages, in order to be able to accurately allocate the expenses of Australian local governments to individual properties via Australian local government rates.
Ministers
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
List of forty (40) proposed ministers of the Australian federal government…
~ Australian Governor-General
(responsible for Australian Department of the Governor-General)
~ Australian Minister for Discussion
(responsible for Australian Discussion)
~ Australian Auditor-General
(responsible for Australian Audit)
~ Australian Minister for Domestic Affairs
(responsible for Australian Department of Domestic Affairs)
~ Australian Prime Minister
(responsible for Australian Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet)
~ Australian Minister for Planning
(responsible for Australian Planning)
~ Australian Minister for Excellence
(responsible for Australian Excellence)
~ Australian Attorney-General
(responsible for Australian Department of the Attorney-General, including Australian Police Force, Australian Judiciary and Australian Punishment and Correction, comprising Australian Executions, Australian Prisons and Australian Orders, with the assistance of Australian Assistant Minister for Police, Australian Assistant Minister for Judiciary and Australian Assistant Minister for Punishment and Correction)
~ Australian Assistant Minister for Police
(responsible for Australian Police Force, under the direction of the Australian Attorney-General)
~ Australian Assistant Minister for Judiciary
(responsible for Australian Judiciary, under the direction of the Australian Attorney-General)
~ Australian Assistant Minister for Punishment and Correction
(responsible for Australian Punishment and Correction, comprising Australian Executions, Australian Prisons and Australian Orders, under the direction of the Australian Attorney-General)
~ Australian Director-General of National Intelligence
(responsible for Australian Department of National Intelligence)
~ Australian Minister for Borders
(responsible for Australian Border Force)
~ Australian Minister for Defence
(responsible for Australian Department of Defence)
~ Australian Minister for Banking
(responsible for Australian Bank)
~ Australian Treasurer
(responsible for Australian Treasury)
~ Australian Minister for Regulation
(responsible for Australian Regulation)
~ Australian Minister for Securities
(responsible for Australian Securities Exchange)
~ Australian Minister for Emergency
(responsible for Australian Emergency)
~ Australian Minister for Environment, Animals and Parks
(responsible for Australian Environment, Australian Animals and Australian Parks)
~ Australian Minister for Roads
(responsible for Australian Roads)
~ Australian Minister for Water
(responsible for Australian Water)
~ Australian Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
(responsible for Australian Agriculture, Australian Fisheries and Australian Forestry)
~ Australian Minister for Mining
(responsible for Australian Mining)
~ Australian Minister for Resources
(responsible for Australian Resources, comprising Australian Coal, Australian Natural Gas, Australian Oil, Australian Steel, Australian Aluminium, Australian Copper, et cetera)
~ Australian Minister for Industry
(responsible for Australian Industry)
~ Australian Minister for Electricity
(responsible for Australian Electricity)
~ Australian Minister for Communications
(responsible for Australian Communications, including Australian Communications Authority and Australian Telecommunications)
~ Australian Minister for Post
(responsible for Australian Post)
~ Australian Minister for Buses and Railways
(responsible for Australian Buses and Australian Railways)
~ Australian Minister for Ports and Marine
(responsible for Australian Ports and Australian Marine)
~ Australian Minister for Airports and Aviation
(responsible for Australian Airports and Australian Aviation)
~ Australian Minister for Services
(responsible for Australian Services)
~ Australian Minister for Education
(responsible for Australian Education)
~ Australian Minister for Health
(responsible for Australian Health)
~ Australian Minister for Welfare
(responsible for Australian Welfare)
~ Australian Minister for Infrastructure
(responsible for Australian Infrastructure)
~ Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs
(responsible for Australian Department of Foreign Affairs)
~ Australian Minister for Trade and Tourism
(responsible for Australian Trade and Australian Tourism)
~ Australian Minister for Migration
(responsible for Australian Migration, comprising Australian Immigration, Australian Detention, Australian Relocation, Australian Deportation and Australian Repatriation)
Equitable Allocation of Spending
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The most equitable means of allocating Australian federal government spending in its characteristically large amounts between different Australian federal electorates, in relation to Australian federal government services, such as education, health and infrastructure, is on the basis of the different numbers of Australian citizens living in different Australian federal electorates, weighted according to the ages of these Australian citizens (on the basis of the extents to which Australian citizens of different ages utilise these Australian federal government services) and possibly weighted according to the different geographical characteristics of different Australian federal electorates, such as density of population, which influence the structure of Australian federal government services to be provided, such as the number of locations at which these Australian federal government services should be provided, thereby affecting the cost of these Australian federal government services to be provided.
Human judgement is NOT an equitable means of allocating Australian federal government spending in its characteristically large amounts between different Australian federal electorates, in relation to Australian federal government services, such as education, health and infrastructure.
It is becoming more apparent that there has not been an equitable allocation of Australian federal government spending in its characteristically large amounts between different Australian federal electorates, in relation to Australian federal government services, such as education, health and infrastructure, for decades, with disastrous consequences for Australian citizens across the entirety of Australia.
Debt
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Once the Australian federal government has established the publicly owned Australian Bank, ban the Australian federal government from incurring Australian federal government debt that is owed to any entity other than the Australian Bank.
So reckless has the Australian federal government been by incurring the Australian federal government debt of circa $940 billion on behalf of Australian citizens that the Australian federal government should default on (i.e. not pay interest on and not repay) all Australian federal government debt that is not owed to foreign countries (i.e. foreign governments of foreign countries), the Australian state, territorial or local governments or the Australian federal government itself, as intragovernmental holdings, in order to expeditiously reduce the Australian federal government debt of circa $940 billion by more than half.
Default by the Australian federal government on this portion of the Australian federal government debt would be tantamount to forcing the entities, to whom and to which this portion of the Australian federal government debt is owed, to repay this portion of the Australian federal government debt.
The Australian federal government should expeditiously repay the remaining Australian federal government debt owing to foreign countries (i.e. foreign governments of foreign countries), Australian state, territorial or local governments or the Australian federal government itself, as intragovernmental holdings, by levying an ad hoc tax at a flat rate of a maximum of 15/85 x 100%, being 17.6%, on the portions of the superannuation balances (i.e. retirement savings) of Australian citizens comprising the compulsory superannuation contributions of Australian citizens, not unrealised capital gains (which should not be taxed, since capital gains should not be taxed), in addition to the existing income tax at the flat rate of 15% already levied on compulsory superannuation contributions in Australia, so that the total tax on gross (i.e. pre-tax) compulsory superannuation contributions in Australia is a maximum of 30% (i.e. income tax at the flat rate of 15% already levied on gross (i.e. pre-tax) compulsory superannuation contributions in Australia plus an ad hoc tax at a flat rate of a maximum of 15% on gross (i.e. pre-tax) compulsory superannuation contributions in Australia).
(Compulsory superannuation contributions constitute income earned, since employers do not make compulsory superannuation contributions on behalf of employees as gifts to employees.)
This would necessitate the sale of portions of the assets in which the compulsory superannuation contributions of Australian citizens are invested by the superannuation funds in Australia on behalf of Australian citizens.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superannuation_in_Australia (third paragraph, first sentence)
“As of 31 December 2024, Australians have AU$4.2 trillion invested as superannuation assets, making Australia as a nation the 5th largest holder of pension fund assets in the world.”
Housing
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Ban non-white immigration into Australia.
Non-white immigration into Australia causes the number of people living in Australia to increase, thereby causing demand for residential properties in Australia in all forms, including houses, apartments and land, to increase and thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
Australia – Population and Demographic Data – 1900 to 2024
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China#Vital_statistics (Natural change equals births minus deaths.)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_India#Vital_statistics (Natural change equals births minus deaths.)
Non-white immigrants to Australia generally do not buy residential properties in Australia as soon as they arrive in Australia. It generally takes time for them to get their finances in order and save up deposits, in order to buy residential properties in Australia. There is generally a lag, often of years, between non-white immigrants to Australia arriving in Australia and demand for the purchase of residential properties in Australia in all forms, including houses, apartments and land, increasing as a result of their arrival in Australia.
This is why house prices in Australia continued to increase during the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19, despite that non-white immigration into Australia was greatly reduced during this time. Non-white immigrants to Australia who had arrived in Australia in previous years had already spent years getting their finances in order and saving up deposits, in order to buy residential properties in Australia, so that by the time the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19 transpired, they were ready to buy residential properties in Australia and did so.
Non-white immigration into Australia also provides a strong stream of tenants to create demand for residential rental properties in Australia, so that residential property investors can confidently earn rental income from their residential rental properties that they own as residential investment properties in Australia. Non-white immigration into Australia leads to an increase in demand for residential rental properties in Australia and an increase in rents. In the 1990s and 2000s, passive income in the form of rents from residential investment properties in Australia, being income earned without working for it, was marketed by the residential property industry in Australia as the holy grail of income. Australia’s economy has been built around this concept of passive income ever since.
Banning non-white immigration into Australia, deporting non-white non-citizens of Australia (with the exception of genuine refugees, on compassionate grounds) back to their countries of origin) and repatriating non-white Australian citizens, on a voluntary, financially incentivised basis, back to their countries of origin would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 30%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.
Ban non-citizens of Australia from purchasing and owning residential properties in Australia.
Allowing non-citizens of Australia to purchase and own residential properties in Australia causes demand for residential properties in Australia to increase, thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
That the Australian federal government has not banned the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia shows that the Australian federal government does not govern exclusively for Australian citizens but for non-citizens of Australia also, of whom there are purportedly more than 8 billion (i.e. 8,000 million). Allowing non-citizens of Australia to purchase and own residential properties in Australia causes the number of people who want to purchase and own residential properties in Australia to increase, thereby causing demand for housing in Australia to increase and thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
Banning the purchase and ownership of residential properties in Australia by non-citizens of Australia would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.
Restrain lending by the banks in Australia to owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and investors in residential properties in Australia.
Unrestrained bank lending to owner occupiers of residential properties in Australia and investors in residential properties in Australia causes the size of the money supply in Australia to increase, since banks in Australia create money when they lend and charge interest on it, thereby causing house prices in Australia to increase.
It is not the number of residential properties in Australia that owner occupiers and investors can buy that should be limited or rationed but necessarily the amount of credit that is extended by the banks in Australia (i.e. loaned) to owner occupiers and investors that should be limited or rationed, in order to prevent a housing bubble in Australia from materialising, which has, of course, existed in Australia for years now and is being deliberately perpetuated by the Australian federal government via non-white immigration into Australia.
The banks in Australia should not be lending more than an adjustable multiple of the incomes of owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and an adjustable multiple of the incomes of investors in residential properties in Australia, to owner-occupiers and investors for all borrowing purposes, including the purpose of buying residential properties in Australia as owner-occupiers and investors.
The banks in Australia should never have been allowed by the Australian federal government (which licenses the banks in Australia to operate) to provide interest-only loans to owner occupiers and investors in Australia.
The banks in Australia should be banned by the Australian federal government from providing interest-only loans in Australia for all borrowing purposes, including the purpose of buying residential properties in Australia.
In the order of 2 million Australian citizens (and presumably non-citizens of Australia) own one or more investment properties in Australia and are therefore investors in residential properties in Australia.
In round terms, one-third of the population of Australia of circa 27 million rents, being circa 9 million people.
Many of these 2 million Australian citizens (and presumably non-citizens of Australia) are seeking to increase the number of residential properties they own in Australia as investments. Since they are overwhelmingly funded by lending from the banks in Australia, rather than their own accumulated wealth, the willingness of the banks in Australia to lend much more to investors in residential properties in Australia as multiples of their incomes than is prudent (in order to increase their interest revenues, since the banks in Australia are motivated by profit, which is marketed to Australian citizens by the Australian federal government as being a sign of a “strong banking system in Australia”) is presumably resulting in multiple investors in residential properties in Australia competing with each other to buy many residential properties in Australia listed for sale, thereby bidding up the sale prices of many residential properties in Australia and thereby contributing significantly to the existing housing bubble in Australia.
Restraining lending by the banks in Australia to owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and investors in residential properties in Australia by limiting it to an adjustable multiple of the incomes of owner-occupiers of residential properties in Australia and an adjustable multiple of the incomes of investors in residential properties in Australia for all borrowing purposes, including the purpose of buying residential properties in Australia as owner-occupiers and investors, would cause house prices in Australia to decrease by at least 15%, which is unavoidably necessary in order to make housing more affordable in Australia.
Emergency
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Fire
Ban controlled burning in Australia as a purported means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia.
Given the unpleasantness of breathing in particulate smoke from controlled burning, the likelihood of wild animals being burned to death as a result of controlled burning and the asininity of lighting fires in order to prevent fires from occurring, controlled burning does not constitute a desirable means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring.
Given that most wildfires (i.e. bushfires) in Australia are caused by arson, designating arson as a capital crime and mandating capital punishment in the form of death by hanging for convicted perpetrators of arson is a desirable means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia by deterring others in Australia (e.g. Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia) from committing arson.
Most wildfires (i.e. bushfires) in Australia are deliberately lit by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia committing arson, in order to diminish the quality of life of as many white Australian citizens as possible.
It is likely that controlled burning in Australia as a purported means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia is actually a similar practice advocated by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia, so that the rationale of using controlled burning in Australia as a purported means of preventing wildfires (i.e. bushfires) from occurring in Australia is a spurious reason for controlled burning that is supplied by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia, in order to provide them with plausible deniability of the real reason for controlled burning in Australia, which is to diminish the quality of life of as many white Australian citizens as possible.
Environment
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Ban the mining method of hydraulic fracturing (“fracking”) in Australia, on account of the mining method of hydraulic fracturing being overtly environmentally damaging to Australia.
Ban the mining method of extracting oil from the bottoms of bodies of water surrounding Australia or in Australia, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, on account of:
~ God never intending mankind to extract oil from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
~ the environmental damage that the mining method of extracting oil from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, causes to bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
~ the history of environmental disasters involving the mining method of extracting oil from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
Ban the mining method of extracting natural gas from the bottoms of bodies of water surrounding Australia or in Australia, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, on account of:
~ God never intending mankind to extract natural gas from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
~ the environmental damage that the mining method of extracting natural gas from the bottoms of bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers, causes to bodies of water, including oceans, seas, bays, lakes and rivers
Animals
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Casual observation of animals of all types leads to the inescapable conclusion that animals depend on human beings to serve and protect their best interests.
Human beings should not let animals down by callously resorting to animal cruelty, which shows a demonic disregard for the welfare of animals that have been created by God and are obviously sentient beings, who are overtly harmed by their experience of physical injury and associated physical pain, as well as their experience of psychological injury and associated psychological pain.
The mistreatment of animals in Australia over previous decades has been egregious and appalling, so that it is likely that Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia are predominantly responsible for it.
Ban microchipping of animals in Australia, including cats and dogs, on the basis that microchipping of animals in Australia constitutes demonic vandalism of animals in Australia that have been created by God.
Criminalise all experimentation on all animals of all types in Australia that harms them in any way.
Ban live export from Australia, being the commercial transport of livestock, such as sheep, across national borders.
It is not necessary to eat meat in order to consume protein, since protein can be consumed by consuming whey, which is made from the milk that cows produce, without needing to be slaughtered.
(If you want to age prematurely and look like an old leather handbag as quickly as possible, then eat as much meat as possible and as few vegetables as possible.
Your degraded appearance will constitute the revenge of the animals you have eaten upon you.
If you want to end up looking like a supermodel, then consume protein via whey, carbohydrates via grains (such as oats for breakfast, bread in sandwiches for lunch and brown rice for dinner), fruit in the afternoon and as many steamed vegetables (especially green beans) for dinner as possible, in order to improve the health of your skin (including your scalp) and consequently the hair on your head (which grows out of your scalp), which both benefit so much from your consumption of as many steamed vegetables (especially green beans) for dinner as possible.)
Banning live export from Australia will spare those who practice live export from Australia from retribution by God, on account of their practice of animal cruelty in Australia via live export of animals He has created.
Ban the killing of feral horses in Australia, on account of the obvious magnificence of feral horses in Australia that have been created by God.
Ban the killing of foxes in Australia, on account of the obvious magnificence of foxes in Australia that have been created by God.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the excessive levels of noise that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia produce, to the detriment of animals in their vicinities, as well as the damage that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia inflict upon animals, such as birds, by injuring and killing them.
Agriculture
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Genetically-modified food
Ban the growing of genetically modified food in Australia, on account of genetically modified food being deliberately designed to be nutritionally deficient.
Live export
Ban live export from Australia, being the commercial transport of livestock, such as sheep, across national borders.
It is not necessary to eat meat in order to consume protein, since protein can be consumed by consuming whey, which is made from the milk that cows produce, without needing to be slaughtered.
(If you want to age prematurely and look like an old leather handbag as quickly as possible, then eat as much meat as possible and as few vegetables as possible.
Your degraded appearance will constitute the revenge of the animals you have eaten upon you.
If you want to end up looking like a supermodel, then consume protein via whey, carbohydrates via grains (such as oats for breakfast, bread in sandwiches for lunch and brown rice for dinner), fruit in the afternoon and as many steamed vegetables (especially green beans) for dinner as possible, in order to improve the health of your skin (including your scalp) and consequently the hair on your head (which grows out of your scalp), which both benefit so much from your consumption of as many steamed vegetables (especially green beans) for dinner as possible.)
Banning live export from Australia will spare those who practice live export in Australia from retribution by God, on account of their practice of animal cruelty in Australia via live export of animals He has created.
Mining and Resources
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The resources in the ground in Australia, including coal, natural gas, oil (from which petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil are produced), iron ore (from which steel is produced), bauxite (from which aluminium is produced), copper sulfide (from which copper is produced) and many other minerals and metals, are owned by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens, not privately owned mining businesses that extract them.
The ownership of the resources in the ground in Australia by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens is a separate concept from the cost of extracting these resources, which cannot be avoided if these resources are going to be utilised.
The resources in the ground in Australia are currently extracted by privately owned mining businesses operating in Australia, which incur the cost of extracting these resources before selling them to domestic markets in Australia and foreign markets in other countries around the world.
The Australian federal government should contract privately owned mining businesses on behalf of Australian citizens to extract the resources in the ground in Australia in physical amounts set by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens.
(This distinction of the Australian federal government setting the physical amount of the resources in the ground in Australia to be extracted on behalf of Australian citizens, on account of its ownership of these resources on behalf of Australian citizens, is presumably missing from the way the mining industry in Australia operates today.)
It would be logical for the Australian federal government to pay privately owned mining businesses the agreed prices of extracting the resources in the ground in Australia and continue its ownership of the extracted resources on behalf of Australian citizens.
The Australian federal government should transfer the ownership of the extracted coal at a price which covers the cost of extraction of this resource on a not-for-profit basis to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Coal”, which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling thermal coal (for electricity generation) and coking coal (for steel production) across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the thermal coal and coking coal that it distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis (such as a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Electricity”, which is responsible for generating, distributing and selling electricity across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the electricity that it generates, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis), as well as distributing and selling both thermal coal and coking coal to other white countries around the world, such as Germany, as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of their white citizens, in order to promote solidarity among white citizens of white countries around the world in their hundreds of millions, as well as thermal coal, not coking coal, to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Taiwan, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
Coal should be used to generate electricity in Australia.
Solar panels can be used by the private sector (i.e. Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities) to generate electricity in Australia but should not be used by the public sector (i.e. Australian federal, state, territorial and local governments) to generate electricity in Australia.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the excessive levels of noise that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia produce, to the detriment of people and animals in their vicinities, as well as the damage that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia inflict upon animals, such as birds, by injuring and killing them.
Natural gas should be used for cooking, heating and transportation in Australia, as well as industrial requirements in Australia (such as manufacturing requirements in Australia) but should not be used to generate electricity in Australia, unless there are compelling reasons to do so.
The Australian federal government should transfer the ownership of the extracted natural gas at a price which covers the cost of extraction of this resource on a not-for-profit basis to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Natural Gas”, which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling processed natural gas across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the processed natural gas that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis, as well as distributing and selling processed natural gas to other white countries around the world, such as Britain, as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of their white citizens, in order to promote solidarity among white citizens of white countries around the world in their hundreds of millions, as well as to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Japan, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
Natural gas should be used for cooking, heating and transportation in Australia, as well as industrial requirements in Australia (such as manufacturing requirements in Australia) but should not be used to generate electricity in Australia, unless there are compelling reasons to do so.
The Australian federal government should transfer the ownership of the extracted oil at a price which covers the cost of extraction of this resource on a not-for-profit basis to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Oil”, which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis, as well as distributing and selling petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil to other white countries around the world, such as New Zealand, as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of their white citizens, in order to promote solidarity among white citizens of white countries around the world in their hundreds of millions, as well as to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as the Philippines, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
The Australian federal government should transfer the ownership of the coking coal produced by “Australian Coal” and the extracted iron ore at prices which cover the costs of the respective production and extraction of these resources on a not-for-profit basis to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Steel”, which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling steel across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the steel that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis, as well as distributing and selling both iron ore and steel to other white countries around the world, such as Sweden, as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of their white citizens, in order to promote solidarity among white citizens of white countries around the world in their hundreds of millions, as well as steel, not iron ore, to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Malaysia, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
The Australian federal government should transfer the ownership of the extracted bauxite at a price which covers the cost of extraction of this resource on a not-for-profit basis to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Aluminium”, which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling aluminium across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the aluminium that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis, as well as distributing and selling both bauxite and aluminium to other white countries around the world, such as Ireland, as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of their white citizens, in order to promote solidarity among white citizens of white countries around the world in their hundreds of millions, as well as aluminium, not bauxite, to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Italy, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
The Australian federal government should transfer the ownership of the extracted copper sulfide at a price which covers the cost of extraction of this resource on a not-for-profit basis to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Copper”, which is responsible for producing, distributing and selling copper across the entirety of Australia, charging Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities for the copper that it produces, distributes and sells on a not-for-profit basis, as well as distributing and selling both copper sulfide and copper to other white countries around the world, such as Austria, as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of their white citizens, in order to promote solidarity among white citizens of white countries around the world in their hundreds of millions, as well as copper, not copper sulfide, to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Indonesia, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
Et cetera.
(The resources in Australia are coal, natural gas, oil, iron ore, bauxite, copper sulfide and many other minerals and metals.)
If Australia had a publicly owned, federal “Australian Bank” that lends without charging interest, then the Australian federal government could finance the cost of paying privately owned mining businesses the agreed prices of extracting resources in Australia via the Australian Bank lending to a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Mining” (i.e. creating money out of nothing when it lends like banks do, by debiting its asset account named “Loans Receivable” and crediting its liability account named “Deposits”, being the bank account of Australian Mining with the Australian Bank, in order to make the funds loaned available to Australian Mining).
Australian Mining could pay privately owned mining businesses the agreed prices of extracting the resources in the ground in Australia and thereby retain ownership of the extracted resources as a publicly owned Australian federal government entity on behalf of Australian citizens.
The loan from the Australian Bank to Australian Mining could be repaid with the funds obtained when these extracted resources are ultimately sold by the publicly owned Australian federal government entity to which ownership of these extracted resources is transferred (i.e. Australian Mining sells these resources on a not-for-profit basis to cover the costs of extraction of these resources and other necessary costs), being “Australian Resources” (comprising “Australian Coal”, “Australian Natural Gas”, “Australian Oil”, “Australian Steel”, “Australian Aluminium”, “Australian Copper”, et cetera), as coal, processed natural gas, petrol (i.e. gasoline), diesel and other by-products of oil, steel, aluminium, copper, et cetera, to end-user Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities, as well as both extracted resources and processed resources to other white countries around the world as an export on a not-for-profit basis for the benefit of white citizens of other white countries around the world and processed resources, not extracted resources (with the exception of thermal coal), to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, within reason, as an export on a for-profit basis for the benefit of their non-white citizens, as well as Australian citizens.
The Australian federal government should sell any extracted resources that are surplus to the needs of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities (such as extracted thermal coal, coking coal, iron ore, bauxite, copper sulfide, et cetera) and any production output that is surplus to the needs of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities (such as processed natural gas, steel, aluminium, copper, et cetera) to other white countries around the world, such as Ireland, Britain, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Ukraine, Russia, Canada and New Zealand, on a not-for-profit basis, at prices that match the costs incurred by the Australian federal government to extract the resources or produce the output, in order to obtain the currencies of these other white countries (held in the banks in these other white countries on behalf of the Australian federal government) and
the Australian federal government should sell any thermal coal, not coking coal or any other extracted resources, that is surplus to the needs of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities and any production output that is surplus to the needs of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities (such as processed natural gas, steel, aluminium, copper, et cetera) to non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Italy, within reason, on a for-profit basis, at prices that exceed the costs incurred by the Australian federal government to extract the thermal coal or produce the output, in order to obtain the currencies of these non-white countries (held in the banks in these non-white countries on behalf of the Australian federal government),
which can be used by the Australian federal government to:
~ purchase goods or services from these other countries, such as motor vehicles for Australian federal government motor vehicle fleets and military equipment for the defence of Australia
~ purchase goods from any one of these other countries on behalf of any given Australian citizen, Australian business or Australian not-for-profit entity, who or which seeks to purchase the goods but needs the currency of the other country before they can purchase the goods, so that the Australian citizen, Australian business or Australian not-for-profit entity can pay the Australian federal government the required price of the goods in Australian dollars on a currency-exchange basis via a publicly owned Australia Bank (containing the bank accounts of every Australian federal government entity, every Australian local government entity, every Australian citizen, every Australian business and every Australian not-for-profit entity), so that the Australian federal government can authorise the appropriate currency under its ownership in the appropriate amount in the appropriate bank in the appropriate other country to be utilised to pay for the goods on behalf of the Australian citizen, Australian business or Australian not-for-profit entity, so that the goods will be dispatched to the Australian citizen, Australian business or Australian not-for-profit entity by the seller of the goods in the other country
Until such time as the Australian federal government can implement this policy in full, the Australian federal government should charge mining businesses operating in Australia royalties of 25% on the sale prices of all resources that mining businesses operating in Australia extract in Australia and sell in Australia or sell to other countries around the world as exports from Australia, including coal, natural gas, iron ore (from which steel is produced), bauxite (from which aluminium is produced), copper sulfide (from which copper is produced) and many other minerals and metals.
These royalties of 25% are based on the notional concept that there are seven components of the sale price of any given resource that any given mining business operating in Australia extracts in Australia and sells to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia, being:
~ the capital investment required by the mining business operating in Australia to extract the resource in Australia
~ the cost incurred by the mining business operating in Australia to extract the resource in Australia
~ the sale price obtained by the mining business operating in Australia for the resource extracted in Australia and sold to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia
~ relevant costs incurred by the mining business operating in Australia, in order to sell the resource extracted in Australia to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia
~ the cost incurred by the mining business operating in Australia of shipping the resource extracted in Australia to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia
~ the interest of the Australian federal government in the resource extracted in Australia and sold to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia, as the rightful owner of the resource on behalf of Australian citizens
~ the interest of the mining business operating in Australia in the resource extracted in Australia and sold to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia, as the extractor and seller of the resource
These royalties of 25% are designed to reflect the entitlement of the Australian federal government to 50% of the operating profit on the resource (being the sale price of the resource minus the extraction cost of the resource, as well as other relevant costs, such as sales costs and shipping costs), on an even-handed partnership basis with the mining business operating in Australia, while recognising the enormous capital investment that mining businesses operating in Australia make, in order to extract resources in Australia, as well as the value of incentivising mining businesses to operate in Australia and extract resources in Australia, for the benefit of Australian citizens and citizens of other countries around the world, by accepting a lower percentage of royalties than the Australian federal government is entitled to (i.e. less than 50% of the operating profit of the resource), as the rightful owner of the resource on behalf of Australian citizens, which is transacting on an even-handed partnership basis with the mining business operating in Australia.
It is important that the Australian federal government properly informs Australian citizens that these royalties of 25% that the Australian federal government charges mining businesses operating in Australia on the sale prices of all resources that mining businesses operating in Australia extract in Australia and sell to buyers in Australia or other countries around the world as exports from Australia do not constitute taxes on the profits of mining businesses operating in Australia but financial compensation paid to the Australian federal government on the sale of these resources in Australia, as the rightful owner of these resources in Australia on behalf of Australian citizens.
These royalties of 25% are not in place of but in addition to Goods and Services Tax (GST) that the Australian federal government presumably charges on the sale of resources extracted in Australia by mining businesses operating in Australia to buyers in Australia because these royalties of 25% are not taxes but financial compensation paid to the Australian federal government on the sale of these resources, as the rightful owner of these resources in Australia on behalf of Australian citizens.
Obviously it could be advantageous for the Australian federal government to charge mining businesses operating in Australia royalties on the sale prices of the different types of resources that mining businesses operating in Australia extract in Australia and sell in Australia or sell to other countries around the world as exports from Australia on a case-by-case basis, specific to:
~ the capital investment required by the mining business operating in Australia to extract the resource in Australia
~ the cost incurred by the mining business operating in Australia to extract the resource in Australia
~ the sale price obtained by the mining business operating in Australia for the resource extracted in Australia and sold to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia
~ relevant costs incurred by the mining business operating in Australia, in order to sell the resource extracted in Australia to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia
~ the cost incurred by the mining business operating in Australia of shipping the resource extracted in Australia to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia
~ the interest of the Australian federal government in the resource extracted in Australia and sold to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia, as the rightful owner of the resource on behalf of Australian citizens
~ the interest of the mining business operating in Australia in the resource extracted in Australia and sold to its buyer in Australia or another country around the world as an export from Australia, as the extractor and seller of the resource
Energy
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Coal should be used to generate electricity in Australia.
Electricity generation and distribution in Australia should be owned, controlled and operated by the Australian federal government on behalf of Australian citizens in the form of a publicly owned Australian federal government entity named “Australian Electricity”, on a not-for-profit basis, in order to minimise the price of the electricity it generates and distributes for the benefit of Australian citizens.
Australian Electricity should be funded via the electricity bills that Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities receive from Australian Electricity and pay to Australian Electricity for the electricity generated and distributed by Australian Electricity that they consume.
Australian Electricity should not seek to generate profits in the course of its operation under any circumstances.
However, it will be necessary for Australian Electricity to seek to generate operating surpluses in the course of its operation, in order to fund expansion of its electricity generation and distribution infrastructure as required, so that it will not be necessary for Australian Electricity to be funded via Goods and Services Tax (GST) collected by the Australian federal government.
(It is permissible for the Australian Bank to lend money to Australian Electricity as required if Australian Electricity has a deficit of funds, which can be repaid by Australian Electricity to the Australian Bank using the funds it receives as a result of Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities paying their electricity bills to Australian Electricity for the electricity generated and distributed by Australian Electricity that they consume.)
Solar panels can be used by the private sector (i.e. Australian citizens, Australian businesses and Australian not-for-profit entities) to generate electricity in Australia but should not be used by the public sector (i.e. Australian federal, state, territorial and local governments) to generate electricity in Australia.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the imposing vandalism of the natural environment that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia constitute and the excessive levels of noise that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia produce, to the detriment of people and animals in their vicinities, as well as the damage that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia inflict upon animals, such as birds, by injuring and killing them.
Natural gas should be used for cooking, heating and transportation in Australia, as well as industrial requirements in Australia (such as manufacturing requirements in Australia) but should not be used to generate electricity in Australia, unless there are compelling reasons to do so.
‘Carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is a fraud.
Carbon dioxide exists in the earth’s atmosphere at less than 400 parts per million (ie. 0.04% or 4% of 1%), which is less than 1 part per 2,500. Therefore it is manifestly obvious that carbon dioxide does not influence the temperature of the atmosphere to any appreciable extent. In short, carbon dioxide emissions are not causing ‘global warming’, nor has it even been proven that ‘global warming’ is occurring.
‘Climate change’, which used to be called ‘global warming’, is a fraud designed to provide another excuse to set up world government on the basis that “it is not possible to fight climate change unless all countries around the world work together in a co-ordinated manner”. The United Nations aspires to be that world government (as a front for the State of Israel) and is controlled by the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan.
In fact, the fraud of ‘carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is promoted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is part of the World Meteorological Organization, which is one of the fifteen agencies of the United Nations.
(Another agency of the United Nations is the World Health Organization, which is responsible for the criminal fraud of non-existent COVID-19 and associated mandates, including mask mandates, lock-downs, vaccination mandates and internment.)
The plan of the United Nations is to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in as many countries as possible, such as Australia, by aggressively encouraging these countries to shut down their coal-powered electricity generation. This serves to reduce the quality of life of the citizens of these countries, such as Australian citizens, by removing the civilising influence of coal-powered electricity, on which citizens of these countries depend for their lighting, refrigeration, hot water and communications, to name just four uses of coal-powered electricity out of many.
The United Nations has created this fictitious idea that carbon dioxide emissions are threatening the world’s climate, via its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in order to provide the pretext for a co-ordinated response administered by world government. However the real objective of the United Nations is to strictly dictate what we citizens around the world can and cannot do as we go about our daily lives, in order to disempower us, control us and rule over us as slaves.
‘Carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is the underlying fraudulent rationale to be used as an excuse for world government to regulate, control and dominate the economic and social affairs of all citizens in all countries. The fraud of ‘carbon dioxide-driven climate change’ is perfectly suited to this purpose because almost every aspect of our daily lives involves carbon dioxide emissions, either directly or indirectly.
Education
One of the reasons for the crisis in schools in white countries around the world is that the minors who attend them, being citizens of white countries around the world under the age of 18 years, have been treated like adults for decades by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in white countries around the world, who have run schools in white countries around the world for decades.
However, the minors who attend schools in white countries around the world are obviously not adults and should not be treated like adults.
Following is the solution, including shorter classes of 45 minutes in length, less irrelevant, mind-numbing material to be learned, longer breaks, including 75 minutes of lunchtime, more monitoring of the behaviour of school students and more punishment of bad behaviour by school students, such as bullying of other school students by Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) and other non-white people, in the form of 30 minutes detention during the last 30 minutes of 75 minutes of lunchtime, until such time as their behaviour improves.
Proposed changes to secondary school that solve most of its problems…
School students should complete secondary school at the age of 17 years.
Noise
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of playing music at any time of the day or night at any residential property in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of playing music at any time of the day or night in a motor vehicle in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing noise as a result of playing music at any time of the day or night at any non-residential property in Australia without a licence, including retail businesses such as supermarkets, restaurants and cafes and not-for-profit entities, should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
(Churches of Jesus Christ in Australia should be expressly exempt from this civil offence because Christianity is the predominant religion of white Australian citizens but other religious organisations in Australia, such as mosques, Hindu temples, Buddhist temples and synagogues, should not be exempt from this offence because none of Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism and other religions are the predominant religion of white Australian citizens.
Primary schools and secondary schools in Australia should also be expressly exempt from this civil offence because they can be trusted to produce a reasonable level of noise as a result of playing music in the course of the activities that primary school students and secondary school students engage in at primary schools and secondary schools in Australia.)
This is the regulation that occupiers of non-residential properties in Australia provoke, including retail businesses such as supermarkets, which have deliberately and willfully annoyed their customers with noise in Australia as a result of playing music at the direction of Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in Australia, day in, day out, week after week, month after month, year after year and decade after decade, as an intentional form of adverse social engineering, in order to adversely influence the attitudes and behaviour of as many white Australian citizens as possible, who visit these non-residential properties in Australia, including retail businesses such as supermarkets.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of talking, raising one’s voice or shouting without reasonable justification at any time of the day or night in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of deliberately closing a door loudly, including slamming a door closed, without reasonable justification at any time of the day or night in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Motor vehicles in Australia should be required to be engineered so that their exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise.
Motorcycles in Australia should be required to be engineered so that their exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise.
Riders of motorcycles in Australia, who do not feel safe riding motorcycles whose exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise, on account of their presence on the road not being readily identified by motor vehicles around them on the road, should not ride motorcycles.
The volume of sirens used by police motor vehicles (including police motorcycles), ambulances and fire engines should be limited, so that they cannot be heard more than 1,000 metres away, in order to limit the disruption they cause to people in their vicinities when they are activated, in the form of excessive levels of noise.
Gasoline-powered (i.e. petrol-powered) leaf blowers in Australia should be required to be engineered so that their exhausts do not produce an excessive level of noise but a reasonable level of noise.
Producing any noise as a result of using gasoline-powered (i.e. petrol-powered) or electrically-powered gardening equipment, including lawn mowers, trimmers, hedge trimmers, leaf blowers, chainsaws and mulchers, before 8 am or after 6:30 pm on weekdays from Monday to Friday or before 10 am or after 6:30 pm on Saturday or Sunday in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing any noise as a result of using electrically-powered tools, including drills, miter saws, circular saws, jigsaws, sanders, grinders and routers, before 8 am or after 6:30 pm on weekdays from Monday to Friday or before 10 am or after 6:30 pm on Saturday or Sunday in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Producing an excessive level of noise as a result of using a generator of electricity, whether powered by gasoline (i.e. petrol), diesel or natural gas, before 8 am or after 6:30 pm on weekdays from Monday to Friday or before 10 am or after 6:30 pm on Saturday or Sunday in any residential area in Australia should be a civil offence that attracts a mandatory fine of an appropriate amount which provides a deterrent against committing this civil offence.
Ban wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia, on account of the excessive levels of noise that wind turbines used to generate electricity in Australia produce.
Political Donations
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
Donations to political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia should be restricted by law to donations by Australian citizens, not businesses or other entities (such as not-for-profit entities) in Australia or other countries around the world, since political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia should represent Australian citizens, not businesses or other entities (such as not-for-profit entities) in Australia or other countries around the world.
There should be no restrictions on the individual value of donations that political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia can receive from Australian citizens.
There should be no restrictions on the total value of donations that political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia can receive from Australian citizens.
Political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia should be required by law to declare the amount of every donation they receive that is greater than an appropriate threshold, such as $100, as well as the source of every donation they receive that is greater than that appropriate threshold, such as $100, identifiable by the legal name of that source, being an Australian citizen, so that Australian citizens can find out which Australian citizens are potentially influencing the decision-making processes of political parties, political candidates and elected representatives in Australia.
Trade
(Although this policy is applicable to white countries around the world, it relates to Australia by way of example.)
The subject of trade conducted by Australia with other countries around the world lends itself to the formulation of the following algorithmic rules:
~ Australia should not levy any tariffs on imports from other white countries around the world, such as Britain, unless those imports from other white countries around the world are harming its industries or industrial development to the detriment of the best interests of Australian citizens.
~ Australia should consider levying reciprocal tariffs on imports from other white countries around the world which levy tariffs on imports from Australia.
~ Australia should not levy any tariffs on imports from allied, non-white countries around the world, such as Japan, unless those imports from allied, non-white countries around the world are harming its industries or industrial development to the detriment of the best interests of Australian citizens.
~ Australia should consider levying reciprocal tariffs on imports from allied, non-white countries around the world which levy tariffs on imports from Australia.
~ Australia should levy tariffs on imports from non-allied, non-hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as Indonesia, unless those imports from non-allied, non-hostile, non-white countries around the world are not harming its industries or industrial development to the detriment of the best interests of Australian citizens.
~ Australia should consider levying reciprocal tariffs on imports from non-allied, non-hostile, non-white countries around the world which levy tariffs on imports from Australia.
~ Australia should suspend trade, including all exports and all imports, with non-allied, hostile, non-white countries around the world, such as China, in order to weaken them economically and therefore politically, until such time as they are no longer hostile towards Australia.
Following is a list of white countries around the world (whose estimated populations are shown):
Ireland – 5 million
Northern Ireland – 2 million
Scotland – 5 million
England – 56 million
Wales – 3 million
France – 67 million
Belgium – 11 million
Netherlands – 17 million
Germany – 83 million
Switzerland – 10 million
Liechtenstein – less than 1 million
Austria – 9 million
Czech Republic – 11 million
Poland – 38 million
Lithuania – 3 million
Latvia – 2 million
Estonia – 1 million
Finland – 6 million
Sweden – 10 million
Norway – 5 million
Denmark – 6 million
Iceland – less than 1 million
Ukraine – 41 million
Russia – 146 million
United States of America – 340 million
Canada – 38 million
Australia – 27 million
New Zealand – 5 million
White people are descendants of Jacob and the Israelites.
Australia should export some of its raw resources on a not-for-profit basis, including
thermal coal (for coal-powered electricity generation),
natural gas,
coking coal (for steel production),
iron ore (for steel production),
bauxite (for aluminium production),
copper sulfide (for copper production),
et cetera,
in addition to some of its processed resources on a not-for-profit basis, including
processed natural gas,
steel,
aluminium,
copper,
et cetera, to
other white countries around the world (such as Ireland, Britain, Germany, Sweden, Canada and New Zealand) as allies,
for the purpose of restoring and strengthening the alliances between Australia and other white countries around the world (such as Ireland, Britain, Germany, Sweden, Canada and New Zealand),
as well as supporting the industrial development of other white countries around the world (such as Ireland, Britain, Germany, Sweden, Canada and New Zealand),
in order to provide stability throughout the world, under the constructive influence of white citizens of white countries around the world,
as opposed to chaos throughout the world, under the destructive influence of Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) around the world.
The Australian Government should suspend all trade by Australia with the United States of America, including all exports from Australia to the United States of America and all imports from the United States of America to Australia, on account of the financial support and military support that the United States Government has provided to the State of Israel for decades, which has enabled the murder of multiple tens of thousands of Palestinians by the Israel Defense Forces (a disingenuous name if ever there was one).
Suspension by the Australian Government of all trade by Australia with the United States of America would influence multiple scores of millions of white United States citizens to drive the Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in the United States of America, who currently control the United States Government, out of the United States of America, such as by convicting them of the capital crime of treason and executing them by hanging or forcibly relocating them to Kazakhstan, since their ancestors lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ.
Jewish people are descendants of Esau and the Edomites.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kazakhstan
While suspension by the Australian Government of all trade by Australia with the United States of America would obviously be unfortunate, to say the least, since the United States of America is a white country like Australia that contains multiple scores of millions of white United States citizens, it is both important and necessary, on account of the ongoing and outrageous genocide that the State of Israel is inflicting on the Palestinians via its Israel Defense Forces, with financial support and military support from the United States Government, currently under the control of Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) in the United States of America.
Australia should export some of its raw resources on a for-profit basis, being only
thermal coal (for coal-powered electricity generation) and
natural gas,
in addition to some of its processed resources on a for-profit basis, including
processed natural gas,
steel,
aluminium,
copper,
et cetera, to
non-white countries around the world that are proven allies of Australia, such as Japan,
not non-white countries around the world that are not proven allies of Australia, such as China and India.
Australia has just spent more than five decades since 1973 trading with China, including exporting iron ore to China (ChatGPT.com: “When did Australia start exporting iron ore to China?” – keep asking until you get the correct answer of 1973), in order to contribute substantially to the development of industry in China, including steel production in China and manufacturing in China, so that China could build up its military and threaten Australia by conducting live-fire exercises off the eastern coast of Australia in February, 2025.
Australia should suspend all trade with China, including all exports from Australia to China (such as iron ore) and all imports from China to Australia, in order to cause the precarious economy of China to fail and throw China into disarray, thereby influencing hundreds of millions of inherently dissatisfied Chinese citizens to revolt and overthrow the widely despised Chinese Communist Party for the benefit of all Chinese citizens, so that the plan of the Chinese Communist Party to invade Australia (in order to obtain more living space for the circa 1,415 million Chinese citizens living in China (ChatGPT.com), together with the abundant resources of Australia (such as iron ore), from which all white countries around the world can benefit through trade with Australia) will be neutralised and China will no longer pose an imminent threat to Australia.
The plan of the Chinese Communist Party to invade Taiwan will also be neutralised.
Australia should suspend all trade with India, including all exports from Australia to India (such as iron ore) and all imports from India to Australia, lest Australia be swallowed up by India, whose population is circa 1,464 million (ChatGPT.com), like Australia is currently at risk of being swallowed up by China, whose population is circa 1,415 million (ChatGPT.com).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_iron_ore_production (India and China are identical in terms of iron ore production.)
English Language
All white, English-speaking countries, being Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, England, Wales, the United States of America, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, should use the same version of the English language with the same spelling and the same grammar in order to facilitate discourse between these countries, promote the health of the church of Jesus Christ in these countries, organise opposition to the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan in these countries and facilitate trade between these countries.
There are currently numerous differences in spelling of the same words between the English in use in Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, England, Wales, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (which is known as the United Kingdom version of the English language) and the English in use in the United States of America (which is known as the United States version of the English language).
Words like “realize”, “utilize” and “organization” that are in use in the United States of America, were previously spelt “realise”, “utilise” and “organisation”.
The Simplified Spelling Board adopted these former spellings involving the letter “z” in the United States of America in 1906 at the behest of the Rothschilds-led synagogue of Satan which is so fond of the letter “z”, probably because the ancestors of Jewish (i.e. Edomitish) adherents of the synagogue of Satan (i.e. Satanists) lived in Khazaria after the time of Christ.
Following is the proposed spelling of 1,726 words of the English language, whose spelling in the United Kingdom version of the English language differs from their spelling in United States version of the English language.
(Presumably, these 1,726 words are not the only words, whose spelling in the United Kingdom version of the English language differs from their spelling in the United States version of the English language.)
Summary of this data:
~ 12 words containing “gram” instead of “gramme”
~ 15 words containing “c” instead of “s”
~ 16 words containing “log” instead of “logue”
~ 27 words containing “e” instead of “oe”
~ 48 words containing “ter” instead of “tre”
~ 73 words containing “ae” instead of “e”
~ 144 words containing “ll” instead of “l”
~ 164 words containing “ou” instead of “o”
~ 188 miscellaneous words
~ 1,043 words containing “s” instead of “z”
(The proposed spelling of “anaesthetise”, “anaesthetised”, “anaesthetises” and “anaesthetising” is included in the category “73 words containing “ae” instead of “e”” and also in the category “1,043 words containing “s” instead of “z””. Therefore the total number of words in the categories listed above is 1,730 instead of 1,726, which is the total number of words for which spelling is proposed.)
Structure of this data from left to right:
~ Version of the English language associated with the proposed spelling of the word, represented by UK for United Kingdom or US for United States or n_ for neither
~ Proposed spelling of the word
~ Spelling of the word in the United Kingdom version of the English language
~ Spelling of the word in the United States version of the English language
(The proposed spelling of “anaesthetise”, “anaesthetised”, “anaesthetises” and “anaesthetising” belongs to neither the United Kingdom version of the English language nor the United States version of the English language.)
Apart from the 1,043 words containing “s” instead of “z”,
the proposed spelling of 450 words is the same as their spelling in the United Kingdom version of the English language,
the proposed spelling of 233 words is the same as their spelling in the United States version of the English language and
the proposed spelling of 4 words is neither the same as their spelling in the United Kingdom version of the English language nor the same as their spelling in the United States version of the English language.
Continued…
All white, English-speaking countries should use the same version of the English language.